<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-02-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4731" />
  <endPage num="4800" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
      <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0000996">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Kangaroo Island Seaport</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3117" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mawson</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-12-05" qonNum="514">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0000997">
          <inserted>514 <by role="member" id="3117">The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL (Mawson)</by> (5 December 2018).  With regard to the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Important Marine Mammals Areas—the task force will be visiting Australian sites including Kangaroo Island and Smith Bay in 2020. Is the government aware that this task force will be in the area to identify and designate significant sites?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-12-05" qonNum="514">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0000998">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning):</by>  I have been advised of the following—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0000999">
          <inserted>The government is aware that the International Union for Conservation of Nature Important Mammals Area Task Force will be coming to Australia in 2020 to identify areas of interest for consideration as an Important Marine Mammals Area.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001000">
          <inserted>The guidelines require the proponent to identify the impacts of the construction and operation of the proposed facility on the marine environment and the marine species and macro algal habitats that use and rely on that environment. The guidelines also require the proponent to undertake detailed risk assessment and identify mitigation measures for such impacts. The Department for Environment and Water were consulted during the preparation of the guidelines.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001001">
          <inserted>Additionally, the proposal at Smith Bay also requires assessment and approval under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act as the proposed action has been identified as likely to have a significant impact on several matters protected by that act, including the southern right whale.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001002">
          <inserted>The guidelines set by the then Development Assessment Commission also includes requirements from the Commonwealth in relation to this matter.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001003">
          <inserted>The environmental impact statement prepared by the proponent must address all of these issues.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001004">
          <inserted>The draft environmental impact statement underwent an agency adequacy check where it was determined, by the relevant agencies, that extra information was required in the environmental impact statement prior to its release for public consultation.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001005">
          <inserted>Following this feedback, the proponent (Kangaroo Island Plantation Timbers) has had multiple meetings with the relevant government agencies to discuss the extra information required.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226b227bcc3c25b44e3a0001006">
          <inserted>The environmental impact statement has subsequently been amended by the proponent and has been resubmitted to government for a further check. The next step in the process involves determining whether these amendments are satisfactory, and if so, the following step will be the formal release of the document for agency and public consultation.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>