<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-02-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4731" />
  <endPage num="4800" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
      <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000988">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Kangaroo Island Seaport</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3117" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mawson</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-12-05" qonNum="513">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000989">
          <inserted>513 <by role="member" id="3117">The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL (Mawson)</by> (5 December 2018).  With regards to the Smith Bay Timber and Woodchip Export Seaport Proposal's Environmental Impact Statement Revision Process, will government agencies and scientists be involved in this revision process?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-12-05" qonNum="513">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Seaport</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000990">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning):</by>  I have been advised of the following—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000991">
          <inserted>The draft environmental impact statement underwent an agency adequacy check where it was determined, by the relevant agencies, that extra information was required in the environmental impact statement prior to its release for public consultation. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000992">
          <inserted>Following this feedback, the proponent (Kangaroo Island Plantation Timbers) has had multiple meetings with the relevant government agencies to discuss the extra information required. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000993">
          <inserted>The environmental impact statement has subsequently been amended by the proponent and has been resubmitted to government for a further check. The next step in the process involves determining whether these amendments are satisfactory, and if so, the following step will be the formal release of the document for agency and public consultation.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000994">
          <inserted>A thorough whole of government assessment process will now be undertaken of the proposal, including consideration of matters raised during the consultation process.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="4798" />
        <text id="2019022662e4534d657a4edb80000995">
          <inserted>Ultimately the decision will be one for cabinet.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>