<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-02-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4425" />
  <endPage num="4542" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water Recovery Socio-Economic Criteria</name>
      <page num="4470" />
      <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000964">
        <heading>Water Recovery Socio-economic Criteria</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-02-12">
            <name>Water Recovery Socio-economic Criteria</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-02-12T14:57:27" />
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000965">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-12T14:57:27" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:57):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Environment. When did the minister make the decision to agree to the changes in the socio-economic criteria?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-02-12">
            <name>Water Recovery Socio-economic Criteria</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-02-12T14:57:37" />
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000966">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-12T14:57:37" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (14:57):</by>  I thank the deputy leader for her question. This was a series of negotiations and work which took place over a lengthy period of time. At the June ministerial council, it was made clear publicly, as I have said—and there was no noise about that at the time—that these socio-economic criteria would be looked at, and a period of time would be spent between senior officials establishing what those criteria could look like before they were presented.</text>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000967">As I have said, I had two options: a pathway towards water or a pathway towards protest. I chose to move towards water. I worked with the senior officials, with academics, with food producers. I worked with many stakeholders across the basin in South Australia as I sought correct advice and canvassed what direction we would head in, and I sought to preserve the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, because we know there was no plan B.</text>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000968">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000969">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000970">
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  And what do Labor want to do? They want to blow up the plan.</text>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000971">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000972">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000973">
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  Do you know who benefits when you blow up the plan? Do you know who benefits? By blowing up the plan you capitulate to New South Wales and Victoria. We need that plan. Because of the tyranny of the geography South Australia needs the plan, because the plan guarantees that critical water flow. Preserving the Murray-Darling Basin Plan—something that the Labor opposition are not interested in—</text>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000974">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5084">Mr Malinauskas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000975">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Leader!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190212b2406679849044fa80000976">
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  —will be a key priority of the Marshall Liberal government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>