<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3707" />
  <endPage num="3790" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Commissioner for Victims' Rights</name>
      <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000775">
        <heading>Commissioner for Victims' Rights </heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-15">
            <name>Commissioner for Victims' Rights </name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-15T14:49:16" />
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000776">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-15T14:49:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON (Kaurna) (14:49):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Does the Attorney-General stand by her decision to sack, over the phone, long-serving and highly respected victims' rights commissioner, Mr Michael O'Connell?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000777">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  Point of order: that question contained argument.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000778">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The argument that something happened, minister?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000779">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  The characterisation in the way that the member put it is not accepted and is entirely objectionable as per the standing orders. If the opposition don't respect the standing orders, then that is their concern.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000780">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Which part of the question, respectfully?</text>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000781">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000782">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000783">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  The accusation that an action had happened in a certain characterisation is inaccurate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000784">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Could I hear the question again?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000785">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Yes. Does the Attorney-General stand by her decision to sack, over the phone, long-serving and highly respected victims rights' commissioner, Michael O'Connell? And everything in there is true.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000786">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I didn't need the explanation. I'm going to allow the question. Deputy Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-11-15T14:50:31" />
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000787">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-15T14:50:31" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (14:50):</by>  Again, I don't accept the premise of the alleged facts, which are clearly not factual from our perspective, in relation to the question.</text>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000788">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000789">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000790">
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN:</by>  Let me just put the position very clearly. Mr Michael O'Connell for some 20 years was in charge in relation to victims and then later became a commissioner of long standing. In fact, I think he was appointed originally by the Hon. Trevor Griffin, not as a commissioner but as the director or executive in relation to victims. So, he had a longstanding commitment to that position and it was expiring within a short time after the change of government.</text>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000791">It is correct that the government determined that there would not be a renewal of that contract and that Ms Bronwyn Killmier would be appointed, after a selection process that took place. We thank Michael O'Connell, as I have in the past, for his service. I am very pleased to report to the parliament that Ms Killmier is working very hard. She has already cleaned out the office in the sense of dealing with a complete new program of data management and file management for victims—</text>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000792">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4841">Mr Picton interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000793">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Kaurna is warned for a second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000794">
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN:</by>  —and is well underway to placing her focus on domestic violence and regional support to victims particularly. I'm pleased to report to the parliament that she is doing an excellent job.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20181115fbb898a10bde4b3380000795">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Enfield, then the member for Kavel.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>