House of Assembly Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1) 54 1 Parliament of South Australia House of Assembly published Answers to Questions Adelaide Remand Centre Adelaide Remand Centre Mr ODENWALDER House of Assembly Elizabeth Adelaide Remand Centre 429 Mr ODENWALDER (Elizabeth) (17 October 2018). Was investigating ways to minimise the time that people are held on remand considered as an option to reduce the costs of running the Adelaide Remand Centre? The Hon. C.L. WINGARD House of Assembly Gibson Minister for Police Minister for Recreation Adelaide Remand Centre The Hon. C.L. WINGARD (Gibson—Minister for Police, Emergency Services and Correctional Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing): I have been advised: The Department for Correctional Services works closely with a range of criminal justice agencies to minimise delays in court proceedings to reduce the time spent in custody for remand prisoners suitable for release to the community. Support provided by the Department includes: Ensuring timely access to legal services; Increasing access to the courts through video conferencing facilities; Undertaking bail assessments, including bail with home detention and electronic monitoring; and Providing prisoners with access to suitable interventions, support and housing services where appropriate. Many people on remand for longer periods have been charged with serious offences. The decision to have these individuals remain in custody on remand is a court matter, with important consideration given to the potential impact on community safety for each individual to be released from custody. Rather than reduce the number of remand prisoners in custody, the Better Prisons reforms will improve prison operations to ensure that services are delivered in the most efficient and effective way to support community safety and security whilst reducing reoffending.