<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-11-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3229" />
  <endPage num="3350" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>ReturnToWorkSA</name>
      <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001283">
        <inserted>
          <heading>ReturnToWorkSA</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>ReturnToWorkSA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001284">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="1810">the Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield)</by> (21 September 2018).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001285">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  I have been advised of the following:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001286">
          <inserted>What were the number of investigations in 2017-18, broken down by employer, worker and provider?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001287">
          <inserted>A total of 314 investigations were completed in 2017-18. Of these investigations, 262 related to employers suspected of under-declaring remuneration and non-compliance with their obligation to provide suitable employment. A further 50 investigations related to workers for suspected benefit fraud and two related to suspected provider fraud.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="3309" />
        <text continued="true" id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001288">
          <inserted>What were the total number of referrals made to external legal providers for opinion, including the Crown, on the matter of prosecutions arising from investigations, broken down by employer, worker and provider in 2017-18?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001289">
          <inserted>The Crown Solicitor's Office is the only external legal provider used by ReturnToWorkSA for prosecutions. A total of five referrals were made to the Crown Solicitor for opinion in relation to the prospects of prosecution pursuant to section 196 of the <term>Return to Work Act </term>2014 in 2017-2018. Of these referrals, four related to alleged offending by workers and one related to alleged offending by a provider to the scheme.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001290">
          <inserted>What were the total number of prosecutions, broken down again by employer, worker and provider, in 2017-18?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20181106ef9ecd3f887548d890001291">
          <inserted>Four matters proceeded to prosecution in the Magistrates Court in 2017-18. Each matter related to offending by workers.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>