<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-09-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2569" />
  <endPage num="2650" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20180919e868f3ffbf174a1f80000812">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Housing Trust Rent</name>
      <text id="20180919e868f3ffbf174a1f80000813">
        <heading>Housing Trust Rent</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-09-19T15:47:06" />
        <text id="20180919e868f3ffbf174a1f80000814">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-19T15:47:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (15:47):</by>  During question time today I was asked to table a document, from which I had quoted, relating to the information received by a person known as Sam, who is or who purported to be a Housing Trust tenant. I have a copy of that, which I read from the electronic transcript. I confirm that the information that I read had been received by the Premier's office last week on his website and had been conveyed to the Minister for Human Services. For the record, I will read the whole of the message. It just says 'Name: Sam', the name required to be placed on the website, and under 'Message' it says:</text>
        <text id="20180919e868f3ffbf174a1f80000815">
          <inserted>Great idea about housing SA, one bedroom, cottage units, we all should pay %25 on pensions etc...not different amounts. Just because of 1 bedroom, still a home. Those people working full time also, go rent private housing SA is for most vulnerable people? My neighbour works f/time, has a great car, and acts like the whole block is his carpark. I'm disabled and struggle daily, something not right about this picture??...its because his rent is capped at $150 a week when market rent is $400. I'm very grateful I have a home, but he rubs it in and here I am struggling to pay my %25 on disability.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20180919e868f3ffbf174a1f80000816">I will make available a printed copy of that, as I was asked to table it and indicated I would do so. I understand, from just checking with the Clerk, that a second document has been received. I have identified that as being the material published by the member for Hurtle Vale, relating to the quote I had made of what I had alleged she was putting out. But I think the mover of the request to have the document tabled was referring to the email, and of course that is what should be made available, and I do make that available.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>