<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-09-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2451" />
  <endPage num="2568" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000972">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Appropriation Bill 2018</name>
      <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000973">
        <heading>Appropriation Bill 2018</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="speech">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-09-18T17:02:13" />
        <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000974">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-18T17:02:13" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (17:02):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000975">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000976">
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE:</by>  This morning, there was a bit of a disagreement raised as a point of order about the numbers I was using about loss of staff or FTEs in the environment and water department. I seek to clarify the position in the budget papers, subject to finding more information, of course, through the estimates process. The particular line to which I was referring was organisational reform.</text>
        <text id="20180918edc5c5cc8507401eb0000977">There are 115 FTEs that are lost in the three-year period of the budget. My reference to over 200 was in reference to effort that is lost to the work in the environment over the three-year period because the 115 positions are not all taken in the final year. They are taken over a three-year period, which means that, having lost 22 people in the 2019-20 year, the effort by those 22 FTEs is also absent the following year and the year after that. By calculating it in that sense, there is something like 246 FTEs in effort missing, but I absolutely accept that it is 115 FTEs.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>