<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-09-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2141" />
  <endPage num="2263" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Road Upgrades</name>
      <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000558">
        <heading>Road Upgrades</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-04">
            <name>Road Upgrades</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-04T14:55:13" />
        <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000559">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-04T14:55:13" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham) (14:55):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport. Why, sir, have you scrapped the $6 million upgrade to the Cheltenham Parade-Port Road intersection?</text>
        <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000560">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000561">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-09-04T14:55:24" />
        <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000562">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-04T14:55:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning) (14:55):</by>  I defer to the member for Cheltenham with his question to say that we haven't. This was actually something that was reported. It was the member for Lee who had a bit of a dig in the paper. I also noticed that the member for Lee had a bit of a dig on Twitter about the Henley Beach jetty in relation to the curved roof, which the member for Colton has been advocating very strongly on. It was actually him who made the decision, and now he is blaming me for the decision that he made.</text>
        <text id="20180904f4bca8c993c341d280000563">In relation to this intersection, it's not that it has been scrapped: it's that it just got a whole lot more expensive. I think the former government may have known that. The project is still there; it is still sitting on the table. We are still keen to try to deliver it. It's just that the bucket of money—which, off the top of my head, is between $5 million and $6 million—doesn't touch the sides of what we are actually going to need to be able to deliver the project. Once again, there is a bit of mess that we are cleaning up. It is going to take us a little bit longer than the time we have had to be able to clean up the mess, but that project is still on the table. We are just working our way through what is the best way to deliver on that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>