<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-08-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1927" />
  <endPage num="2020" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Foster Care</name>
      <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000636">
        <heading>Foster Care</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5376" kind="question">
        <name>Ms STINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Badcoe</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-08-01">
            <name>Foster Care</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-08-01T15:00:21" />
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000637">
          <timeStamp time="2018-08-01T15:00:21" />
          <by role="member" id="5376">Ms STINSON (Badcoe) (15:00):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Child Protection. Has the minister ever advocated for the usual checks to be waived or for applications from her friends to be fast-tracked to enable them to be foster carers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-08-01">
            <name>Foster Care</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-08-01T15:00:35" />
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000638">
          <timeStamp time="2018-08-01T15:00:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON (Adelaide—Minister for Child Protection) (15:00):</by>  Absolutely not. That's ridiculous. Everybody should go through the exact same checks. Certainly, in other regions—and I believe it was maybe Key Assets, mentioned in other countries; I believe they've got agencies in England—there are other ways of doing the training. There are some programs where there's intensive interviewing and psychological testing before you do the training, so that culls people early on, rather than going through extensive long courses in training.</text>
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000639">There are many ways that we can improve the system, potentially having the training standardised and modulised so that, if you happen to ring an agency that doesn't have any proposed training in your area for six months, you could train with another agency so that we can fast-track and get people involved as soon as possible. I have met with—</text>
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000640">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000641">
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON:</by>  —people who have told me it's taken 18 months—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000642">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201808012bbf3b891ae3486380000643">
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON:</by>  —to become accredited as a foster carer. We can't afford for people to drop out of the system because it's an inefficient system. We need to look at how we make this a smooth professional transition from somebody interested in being a foster carer to accrediting them as a foster carer. I would never, ever suggest that anybody would skip that system and become a foster carer without the appropriate training. They may have other qualifications that could be considered, but there is a training level that is expected, and everyone goes through that same training.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>