House of Assembly Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1) 54 1 Parliament of South Australia House of Assembly published Question Time Keogh Case Keogh Case Mr KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly West Torrens Keogh Case Mr KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (14:59): My question is to the Attorney-General. Did the Attorney-General read and consider the findings of the extensive review into the Keogh case undertaken by the then solicitor-general and now Chief Justice, the Hon. Christopher Kourakis SC, and provided to the governor before making an ex gratia payment of $2.57 million to accused murderer Henry Keogh? The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN House of Assembly Bragg Deputy Premier Attorney-General Keogh Case The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (14:59): Not that I'm aware of. I'm not exactly sure what document you're even talking about. Could you just reread the first part of the question? Mr KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly Mr KOUTSANTONIS: Sure. Did the Attorney-General read and consider the findings of the extensive review into the Keogh case undertaken by the then solicitor-general and now Chief Justice, the Hon. Christopher Kourakis SC, provided to the then governor before making an ex gratia payment of $2.57 million to accused murderer Henry Keogh? The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN House of Assembly The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN: No. I haven't read any advice that was presented to the former government, and— Mr Koutsantonis House of Assembly Mr Koutsantonis: That's not what you've told the parliament. The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN House of Assembly The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN: Legal advice. Mr Koutsantonis interjecting: The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN House of Assembly The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN: Legal advice. Members interjecting: The Speaker House of Assembly The SPEAKER: Order! The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN House of Assembly The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN: No, no, sorry. I have not read advice to the previous government in respect of anything that prior solicitors-general have presented to the former governor. I'm assuming this was advice given 15 years ago, but if we're talking about the same document then, no, I haven't read it.