<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1589" />
  <endPage num="1693" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Australian Craniofacial Unit</name>
      <page num="1628" />
      <text id="201807240e5c8bdb9b5c432890000637">
        <heading>Australian Craniofacial Unit</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-07-24">
            <name>Australian Craniofacial Unit</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-07-24T15:06:15" />
        <text id="201807240e5c8bdb9b5c432890000638">
          <timeStamp time="2018-07-24T15:06:15" />
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON (Kaurna) (15:06):</by>  My question is again to the minister representing the Minister for Health. Why did the minister tell the house today that David David was well aware of the review, and on what basis did he give that advice to the house?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-07-24">
            <name>Australian Craniofacial Unit</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-07-24T15:06:31" />
        <text id="201807240e5c8bdb9b5c432890000639">
          <timeStamp time="2018-07-24T15:06:31" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart—Minister for Energy and Mining) (15:06):</by>  I gave that advice to the house because I believe it to be true. I find it extraordinary to think that Dr David David—an extraordinarily highly respected South Australian and Australian—would not have been aware of the fact that the Australian craniofacial foundation had changes proposed to it, from those inside it and those outside it, and that people in government and in other places would not be considering the best way to change, or keep the same, the NEG.</text>
        <text id="201807240e5c8bdb9b5c432890000640">I find it amazing that a man so well connected, so well educated and so integrally part of the fabric of the Australian craniofacial foundation would not have known about that review. That's why I made the comment I made.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>