<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-07-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1433" />
  <endPage num="1504" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Keogh Case</name>
      <text id="20180704ee8b5739877e449780000497">
        <heading>Keogh Case</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question">
        <name>Mr KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-07-04">
            <name>Keogh Case</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-07-04T14:51:14" />
        <text id="20180704ee8b5739877e449780000498">
          <timeStamp time="2018-07-04T14:51:14" />
          <by role="member" id="633">Mr KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Did the Attorney-General consult with the victims of crime commissioner in relation to the payment to Mr Keogh?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-07-04">
            <name>Keogh Case</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-07-04T14:51:26" />
        <text id="20180704ee8b5739877e449780000499">
          <timeStamp time="2018-07-04T14:51:26" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (14:51):</by>  The answer to that question is no. However, I did consider the question of whether the victims of crime commissioner ought to be advised in respect of the decision of the government and the invitation to coordinate any arrangements with the family, but I was informed by my department that in fact the victims of crime commissioner hadn't been involved in this case; that is, there were other parties, including the witness support program through the DPP's office, that had had most contact with the members of the family.</text>
        <text id="20180704ee8b5739877e449780000500">Indeed, it was through those personnel that we then set up the proposed invitation and arrangements for that purpose. So, yes, it was considered as to whether that was appropriate, and my advice was that there were other personnel who had taken up that responsibility within the government departments to support the victims in those circumstances.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>