<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1055" />
  <endPage num="1149" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <text id="201806194f484eb3dd674dab80000346">
        <heading>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-19">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-19T14:36:10" />
        <text id="201806194f484eb3dd674dab80000347">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-19T14:36:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:36):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Environment and Water. Can the minister advise which big water users will be targeted to get more water for the Murray-Darling Basin? On 9 June, the Minister for Environment and Water stated that big Adelaide water users would be targeted to get more water in the Murray-Darling Basin.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-19">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-19T14:36:36" />
        <text id="201806194f484eb3dd674dab80000348">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-19T14:36:36" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (14:36):</by>  I thank the deputy leader for her question. At the recent ministerial council, an agreement was forged between the commonwealth and the states to establish a way forward to reaching the 450 gigalitres of environmental flows to the River Murray. We know across both sides of this house that that 450 gigalitres is absolutely fundamental to the fulfilment of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan and the preservation of the health of the River Murray, particularly the Lower Lakes, the river mouth and the Coorong.</text>
        <text id="201806194f484eb3dd674dab80000349">In the discussions with other jurisdictions, it became apparent that low-hanging fruit around urban water, industrial users and off-farm measures were what the first effort to gain that 450 gigalitres would be focused on. But we also know that 450 gigalitres, the vast majority of it, does not need to come from South Australia, given our geographical position at the bottom end of the river.</text>
        <text id="201806194f484eb3dd674dab80000350">Any focus on the delivery of additional water from South Australian users to make up our small contribution would be around looking at urban water opportunities. That could look at anything from stormwater harvesting to additional desalination opportunities to enable the delivery of—again, I emphasise—our small contribution towards environmental flows from the River Murray.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>