<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-05-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="187" />
  <endPage num="262" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000638">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Transport Infrastructure</name>
      <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000639">
        <heading>Transport Infrastructure</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-05-10T15:14:49" />
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000640">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-10T15:14:49" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">Mr MULLIGHAN (Lee) (15:14):</by>  What a shocking, terrible week for this fledgling government. They spent most of the last week boasting about this fantastic infrastructure deal that they had apparently done on behalf of the people of South Australia, and it only took the release of the federal budget on Tuesday night for all that deceptive, misleading, deceitful spin to come unravelling.</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000641">The boasts of the member for Schubert that he had done a great deal on behalf of the state, that he had repaired the relationship, that he had taken a mature approach to negotiations and that the dividends were flowing—well, nothing could be further from the truth. He crowed about $1.8 billion, and so did the Premier. We were told $1.8 billion of new infrastructure funding was coming to South Australia over the next four years to 'continue the pipeline of projects currently underway'. 'Locked in,' said the member for Schubert; 'definitely happening', said the member for Schubert; and 'the first one to be delivered in the 2019-20 financial year'—so he committed on ABC radio and so he recommitted in this chamber in question time.</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000642">What did we find out on Tuesday night? That only $162 million of that $1,800 million that he said he had secured for South Australia was going to be delivered over the next four years—less than one-tenth of what he had been crowing to every media outlet and what he had the temerity to come into this place, on Wednesday afternoon, and claim that he had secured.</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000643">It was a dud deal, and this is what happens when you send your most junior, most inexperienced cabinet minister over to Canberra to negotiate with the federal government. They get played like a fiddle, and what a tune that fiddle played: a melancholy requiem of disappointment and dejection for the thousands of South Australian civil construction workers who were relying on the member for Schubert, as minister, to secure that future pipeline of projects, let alone the dozens of South Australian businesses and subcontractors who are keeping their heads above water on these projects that the Labor government secured at the moment. It is a comprehensive failure by this inept government to do a good deal with their Coalition buddies.</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000644">Most importantly, we have to ask: did the member for Schubert or the Premier even ask the federal government how much of that $1.8 billion was going to be provided over the next four years? Did they even ask? They could not have, surely, because if they had asked and if they had been told what was coming over the next four years then it means that they have engaged in over a week of calculated, deceptive spin to deliberately hoodwink South Australians about this deal. It means that they knew and they deliberately misled South Australians. What outrageous behaviour.</text>
        <page num="232" />
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000645">But, of course, I am a bit more generous than that. I will give them the benefit of the doubt—that they did not even have the brains to ask, that they just got what was given to them unquestioningly. How could a minister and a government be so inept in their dealings with a federal government? The minister did not have a clue in question time about how much money had been allocated across the forward estimates when he was specifically asked, project by project, the day after the federal budget had been handed down. This was despite the fact that that detail had been publicly released. It was in a press release on the federal infrastructure minister's website. How could he have not seen it?</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000646">I have to say that the member for Schubert, his frontbench and the member for Sturt—sorry, Mr Speaker, I meant the Premier; that was a genuine, Freudian slip—this is the way they enjoy being treated by their Coalition counterparts. They rolled over on Holden. They were ready to roll over on the submarines. They roll over on education funding, they roll over on health funding and they even rolled over on pensioner support in the 2014 budget—absolutely shameful.</text>
        <text id="2018051047d69d0c8f0441bab0000647">Time expired.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>