<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2018-05-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="187" />
  <endPage num="262" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cost of Living</name>
      <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000529">
        <heading>Cost of Living</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5385" kind="question">
        <name>Mr ELLIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Narungga</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-10">
            <name>Cost of Living</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-10T14:57:38" />
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000530">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-10T14:57:38" />
          <by role="member" id="5385">Mr ELLIS (Narungga) (14:57):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government.</text>
        <page num="226" />
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000531">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000532">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member will be heard in silence. Member, continue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5385" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr ELLIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000533">
          <by role="member" id="5385">Mr ELLIS:</by>  Can the minister update the house on how the state government plans to lower the cost of living for all South Australians by introducing rate capping on council rates?</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000534">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000535">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Reynell is called to order.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000536">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000537">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Kaurna is called to order.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000538">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000539">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Lee is warned a second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-05-10T14:58:12" />
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000540">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-10T14:58:12" />
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning) (14:58):</by>  Rate capping is a policy that the South Australian Liberal Party has been prosecuting for five years now. It's something that we have, up hill and down dale, fought with to help the South Australian public understand this issue and help them to realise how important it is and what we can actually do to help fix this situation. Upon having been sworn in as the minister for this portfolio and having realised, very quickly, that this is going to be a major fight that is my job, on behalf of the cabinet and the party, to prosecute, the more information I have sought and the more important this policy has become in my eyes.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000541">The real rub of this problem is the fact that when you look at what councils have done over the past decade in terms of rate increases, it is so out of step with where ratepayers think it should be and where households and businesses can actually afford to pay, that it is imperative that this parliament acts to enact rate capping. Over the past 10 years, to 2016-17, there was a 79 per cent increase in rates revenue over that 10-year period. Over the same time, CPI was only increased by 26 per cent. That is a huge differential, especially when you consider that state taxation only increased at basically the same rate as inflation over that same period.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000542">Councils do, I think, spend money wisely, but there has to be a limit to the amount of money they can take out of ratepayers' pockets. Whilst there can always be good arguments for why governments of all persuasions need to spend money, the Liberal Party seems to be the only party that is willing to stand up and say enough is enough. There may be many worthy causes out there but, at the end of the day, sometimes people's pockets are empty. That is where the South Australian Liberal Party is stepping in to protect ratepayers from exorbitant increases—79 per cent is not okay.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000543">In the 2017-18 year, the average is 6 per cent, whilst at the same time inflation is running at a third of that rate. This cannot be sustainable and over the longer term will further and further punish South Australian ratepayers. We also see instances of where council should probably look at tightening their own belt, whether it comes to golf memberships, whether it comes to expensive IT, whether it comes to expensive dining and wine—</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000544">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000545">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER  Order!</by>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000546">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  —councils need to—</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000547">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000548">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! Members on my left will remain quiet. The member for Lee is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000549">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  What I am really enjoying is how members opposite would love to stand up and say that a golf membership is okay.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000550">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Don't provoke, minister. Please continue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="227" />
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000551">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  We have one half of this parliament that has for the past five years stood here and said that there is no argument for rate capping. What I want to know is why members opposite think it's okay that 6 per cent average increases for council rate revenue is okay.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000552">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000553">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER  Order!</by>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000554">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  Is it because they have never met a tax increase they didn't like? Whether it's the car park tax, whether it's the bank tax, or whatever else it is, this government will—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000555">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000556">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  There's a point of order, minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000557">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Standing order 98: I think the minister has diverged—</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000558">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000559">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  98.</text>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000560">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000561">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER  Order!</by> For debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000562">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Mr Speaker, standing order 98: I think the minister has diverged into debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000563">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I think the minister was wrapping up his answer. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2018051065bea7a025c94640b0000564">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  He was. To bring the house up to date with where we are at, we have progressed very early stages of the legislation; actually, it is in the process of being drafted right now. As part of our 100-day commitment, we will bring this legislation to parliament within 100 days. What I would like to do, and what I have committed to the Local Government Association to do, is consult with them on that draft bill before we bring it into this place, time permitting. There will be many conversations that we are going to have. I know that this scheme is going to be made all the better from the input of the local government sector, as opposed to them sitting on the sidelines without it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>