<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000616">
        <heading>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:37:36" />
        <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000617">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:37:36" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:37):</by>  My supplementary is to either the Attorney-General or the minister. When the bundle of documents is identified, could you inquire whether any of those documents was made available to the Auditor-General for the purposes of undertaking their investigation of this matter?</text>
        <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000618">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Wright is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:38:00" />
        <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000620">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:38):</by>  Now it seems we are at cross-purposes. I thought that the earlier questions were about the bundling for the purposes of a freedom of information request. Now we seem to be interested in bundling for the purposes of an auditor-general's inquiry. It would be up to the management of an agency, which is currently in the process of responding to a request for information from an auditor-general about what documents and whether they are bundled or loose-leafed, that they are provided to the Auditor-General.</text>
        <page num="12380" />
        <text id="20171129894c2b14c69841bea0000621">I am happy to provide some information to the house, seeking further information about whether they have been provided for the purposes of a freedom of information application, but the transmission of documents for the purposes of an inquiry surely is the purview of the management, not the executive government, and the Auditor-General who conducts the inquiry.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>