<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000597">
        <heading>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:34:06" />
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000598">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:34:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:34):</by>  Supplementary to the Attorney-General: given that three freedom of information applications were issued in respect of correspondence covering the period in late 2013, of which the Attorney-General himself—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000599">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Can we have a question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000600">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  —as the minister provided one document, can he explain why the bundle of documents prepared by DPTI and the FOI officer that was sent to the Attorney-General's Department late last year has not been returned?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:34:39" />
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000601">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:34:39" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:34):</by>  As we would all appreciate, dealing with freedom of information matters, either as requestors or as people held to account for their contents, these matters are managed by the agencies. What is discovered, of course, needs to be done in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act. The level of detail within the documents that are discovered is also—</text>
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000602">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000603">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  This is the second time I have pointed out to the leader that he is on two warnings. I thought the idea of the member for Heysen interjecting instead was an inspired one. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="12379" />
        <text id="20171129ac1a58fa2d29487ca0000604">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. As I was saying, the way in which these responses are managed is done by agencies according to law. The level of discovery and the level of detail which is released within those discovered documents is done by the accredited FOI agents within each of these agencies. If the question is: why haven't documents, which were provided for the purpose of responding to a freedom of information application to one agency that were provided by another agency in an effort to respond to that, not been returned to the client agency, well, that's a great question. I will ask the agency involved.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>