<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20171129810b30771feb4bcf90000593">
        <heading>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:32:36" />
        <text id="20171129810b30771feb4bcf90000594">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:32:36" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Why has the bundle of documents regarding the correspondence between the Department of Transport and Infrastructure and the Walker Corporation on the Festival Plaza redevelopment, identified by the freedom of information officer in DPTI and forwarded to the Attorney-General's Department last year, not been returned to her with advice as to the confidentiality of any documents or at all?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Festival Plaza Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:33:10" />
        <text id="20171129810b30771feb4bcf90000595">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:33:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:33):</by>  In trying to follow the precise nature of the deputy leader's question, I think what she is getting at is whether the information that has been provided to her under a freedom of information request reflected the information that has been provided.</text>
        <text id="20171129810b30771feb4bcf90000596">What I am advised is that the development agreement that was entered into between the government and Walker Corporation—and, I should make it clear, somewhat subsequent to the events we were just discussing back in late 2013 and 2014, the development agreement that was reached at some later stage—has not only been provided to the deputy leader in a briefing with the head of Renewal SA but has, in some redacted form, been provided to her by freedom of information. I remember also receiving questioning on this as Minister for Housing and Urban Development in my first estimates committee and reading the information into <term>Hansard</term>.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>