<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
      <text id="20171129ba1cb30e72d24a8790000585">
        <heading>Riverbank Precinct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:29:29" />
        <text id="20171129ba1cb30e72d24a8790000586">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:29:29" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:29):</by>  Supplementary to the minister: during or after the meeting on 27 November 2013 with former senator Nick Bolkus, then the lobbyist for the Walker Corporation, did he discuss his decision to change the government's lead negotiator with Walker Corporation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:29:52" />
        <text id="20171129ba1cb30e72d24a8790000587">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:29:52" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:29):</by>  I am not personally aware of that particular meeting. I would have to see if there is any advice that could be provided to me about that. Again, I think that the criticism levelled by the Auditor-General about the particular discussions between the former head of the infrastructure agency and Walker Corporation is the lack of record keeping about the particular conduct of those meetings. I think that it is up to that subsequent exchange of correspondence between the two chief executives of Premier and Cabinet and the infrastructure agency to shed further light on it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>