<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
      <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000579">
        <heading>Riverbank Precinct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:28:00" />
        <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000580">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  Supplementary: could the minister, having indicated the government's desire to progress this project, advise the parliament, at this meeting with Walker Corporation on 26 November 2013, did the company ask the government to remove Renewal SA as the government's negotiator for the Riverbank Precinct and substitute the chief executive of DPTI?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:28:27" />
        <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000581">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:28:27" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:28):</by>  I am not sure that anyone can glean that from the contents of the report—</text>
        <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000582">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000583">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The minister does not need the assistance of the Minister for Education; she is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711291ddd2d9dbb5344d9b0000584">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you for your protection, Mr Speaker. I think the criticism of the Auditor-General's Report, amongst others, was that early in the conduct of the discussions between government and Walker, and in particular regarding the conduct of that particular meeting, was that there were insufficient records that were able to be made available to the Auditor-General about that particular meeting. I think that is the basis for the criticism. To then try to draw the inference or the imputation that the deputy leader seeks to, I think is a bridge too far.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>