<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
      <text id="201711293050e53a693b4383b0000574">
        <heading>Riverbank Precinct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:26:30" />
        <text id="201711293050e53a693b4383b0000575">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:26:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:26):</by>  Further supplementary to the Treasurer: given the minister's answer in response to the question as to the action of the chief executive then meeting with Mr Walker, did the chief executive make the decision to change from Renewal SA to DPTI's management of this project, or was it the government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:26:54" />
        <page num="12377" />
        <text id="201711293050e53a693b4383b0000576">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:26:54" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:26):</by>  It also goes on in the report to outline that—I believe it was on 7 January or in early January immediately following that November, in the beginning of 2014—the then chief executive of the Department of the Premier and Cabinet corresponded with the chief executive of the infrastructure agency to get an understanding of where negotiations were up to. It makes it clear in the report the response from the chief executive of the infrastructure agency and his reading of that. Beyond that recollection from the former chief executive—of the infrastructure agency that is—I am not quite sure what else can be added. The inference, I think, that the deputy leader is trying to give the chamber is that there was something—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711293050e53a693b4383b0000577">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Ms Redmond:</by>  No, it's an implication from her; it will be an inference on your part.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711293050e53a693b4383b0000578">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  The member for Heysen says 'an implication'; some might call it an imputation—neither of which, in any event, would be relevant.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>