<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12345" />
  <endPage num="12439" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20171129dc6ee79fd1674b1980000520">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
      <text id="20171129dc6ee79fd1674b1980000521">
        <heading>Riverbank Precinct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:11:54" />
        <text id="20171129dc6ee79fd1674b1980000522">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:11:54" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:11):</by>  My question is to the Deputy Premier. After becoming the Minister for Housing and Urban Development following the 2014 election, did the Deputy Premier seek the advice of an independent QC about the development of the Riverbank Precinct?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-29">
            <name>Riverbank Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-29T14:12:11" />
        <text id="20171129dc6ee79fd1674b1980000523">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-29T14:12:11" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:12):</by>  I thank the leader for his question. It is made clear throughout the report which was tabled in parliament from the Auditor-General about the Festival Plaza project that throughout the course of the project there was a significant amount of advice and analysis which was provided to government to enable it to make decisions at various points along the path. In fact, I think it is even spelt out to this level of granularity: a lot of that information was provided so that cabinet could make a decision at various different junctures. Of course, in that context, it would be inappropriate to comment about the specific nature of that advice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>