<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12261" />
  <endPage num="12344" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000512">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>One Community</name>
      <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000513">
        <heading>One Community</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-28">
            <name>One Community</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-28T14:31:39" />
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000514">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-28T14:31:39" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  My question is to the Premier. What responsibility does the Premier accept following the Auditor-General's finding that his department did not properly administer a $750,000 grant to the One Community organisation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-28">
            <name>One Community</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-28T14:31:54" />
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000515">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-28T14:31:54" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for the Arts) (14:31):</by>  I accept responsibility that that administrative process wasn't up to scratch, and we have put in place the measures to ensure that that will be improved. But let's be absolutely clear about what was found, it appears, from the Auditor-General, and that is that the particular grant was consistent with the guidelines, guidelines which have since been strengthened. It also found that the grant was applied to the purpose for which it was granted.</text>
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000516">It also disposes of that nonsense that was running around that somehow the grant application was approved on the day it was received. All the misinformation about this so-called One Community grant has been dispelled here. We maintain our position that we were entitled to, and will continue to, campaign against the $80 billion cut to health and education that was laid down in that Hockey-Abbott budget. To give you some idea of the success, we have secured an additional $125 million as a consequence of—</text>
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000517">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000518">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —the campaigning efforts we have made against the education cuts. There is still another $210 million that has been cut from South Australian schools, and we are not going to abandon our campaign. We are going to continue to campaign against those cuts in education that are affecting South Australian schools, Catholic schools and public schools. This is a commonwealth government that has turned its back on a signed agreement with a state government. It is unacceptable, and we are going to continue to campaign against those cuts.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="12291" />
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000519">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I call to order the members for Heysen, Morialta and Colton, the deputy leader, the member for Davenport, the member for Adelaide—if it would not be bullying to do so—and the members for Stuart and Morialta.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000520">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order: can I ask that you withdraw that comment?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017112877942776c313408aa0000521">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  An imputation was made by the Hon. Michelle Lensink. I have just responded to it. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>