<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12155" />
  <endPage num="12260" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Recruitment</name>
      <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000560">
        <heading>Public Sector Recruitment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-16">
            <name>Public Sector Recruitment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-16T14:48:07" />
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000561">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-16T14:48:07" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:48):</by>  Supplementary: whilst appreciating the Attorney has indicated that he is waiting on some advice on questions previously asked, can he provide to the house any details of which independent body is actually undertaking the review of the public sector hiring practices?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-16">
            <name>Public Sector Recruitment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-16T14:48:27" />
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000562">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-16T14:48:27" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:48):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. As you would be aware, occasionally—I don't think my time has started again—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000563">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  We lose all sense of time when you are on your feet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000564">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. The question that was asked by the deputy leader contained one relevant word that I'm not sure had previously been used in the conversation about this, which was the word 'independent', which implied in the question that I had asserted somewhere that some external agency or somebody else might in fact be involved in this. I have not said that and that is not the case.</text>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000565">What I am advised is that, following the episode that I was going through in some detail before, which I know members probably don't want me to repeat, the chief executive, Dr Russell, established an immediate review into the recruitment process, that being an internal review by people within his agency. Subsequent to that review, he directed that—and this is my advice as to exactly what his directions were consequent upon that—all future senior appointments would be subject to detailed police and security checks. Mr Speaker—</text>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000566">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000567">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Will the Deputy Premier be seated. The leader took a point of order only 10 or 15 minutes ago saying that the Treasurer was imputing improper motives to him. He is now challenging the Deputy Premier in saying, 'What have you got to hide?' If that isn't imputing improper motives, I don't know what is. Deputy Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="12195" />
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000568">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I am doing my best to inform the house to the best of my ability. Anyway, as I said, Dr Russell conducted this review. He has indicated, and instructed accordingly, that across the public sector there needed to be a very rigorous identification of work history, qualifications and referees prior to employment being offered, in line with the mandatory requirements outlined in the new Guideline of the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment: Recruitment, which came into effect on 6 July this year. This includes, importantly, a forensic investigation of candidates' social media profiles, which I am informed can sometimes be quite revealing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000569">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  He made a joke.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000570">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I'll just leave it at that. Also, there were communications across DPC to ensure selection panel members are conversant with the selection process, including due diligence obligations. If there are further matters that I can assist the deputy leader with, I am very happy to do it, but as I said, I have specifically spoken to Dr Russell. I have said, 'Look, the deputy leader is extremely interested in this topic.' </text>
        <text id="201711166bcdd883b6794444b0000571">I have had my staff extract the <term>Hansard</term> containing the questions, and I have stressed to Dr Russell how I thought it was important that we provide written answers to those questions as soon as possible. At the end of question time, I undertake to go back to my office and ask my staff to follow up on exactly where all those answers are.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>