<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-11-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11777" />
  <endPage num="11886" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Parliamentary Procedure</name>
    <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000966">
      <heading>Parliamentary Procedure</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Speaker's Ruling</name>
      <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000967">
        <heading>Speaker's Ruling</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="speech">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <startTime time="2017-11-01T19:30:31" />
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000968">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-01T19:30:31" />
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER (19:30):</by>  During question time, the member for Stuart asked the Treasurer a question by way of a supplementary, and <term>Hansard</term> renders it this way:</text>
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000969">
          <inserted>Supplementary: does the minister agree with the head of GFG Alliance, Mr Sanjeev Gupta, who told the International Mining and Resources Conference in Melbourne yesterday that Australia has 'the highest cost energy environment in the world' and that South Australia has the most expensive electricity in the nation?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000970">The ordinary plain meaning of that is that the final words 'and that South Australia has the most expensive electricity in the nation' is indirect speech—that is to say, the member for Stuart has finished the direct quote of Sanjeev Gupta but then he is effectively quoting by way of summary what Mr Sanjeev Gupta went on to say. I have spoken to the member for Stuart during the dinner adjournment and he says, no, he does not mean that.</text>
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000971">He means that in regard to the words 'and that South Australia has the most expensive electricity in the nation', he is not attributing those words to Sanjeev Gupta. They are the member for Stuart's words, so although it may seem odd, the member for Stuart's question was: does the Treasurer agree with him, the member for Stuart, in the second leg? Could the member for Stuart just confirm that that is the correct construction of the question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="11850" />
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000972">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Yes, Speaker. Thank you for bringing this issue back to us. The way you have described it is right. I looked at the draft <term>Hansard</term>. It accorded with the question I wrote and it accorded with what I believe I said. My intention in that was: does the Treasurer (or in this instance the Minister for Energy) accept what Mr Gupta said—and I was very careful to audibly open and close the quotes when I spoke, and Hansard picked that up—and also that South Australia has the highest electricity prices in the nation. Whether he chose those to be my words or just a fact in general or a theory that I was asking him to consider, yes: does he agree with A, clearly in quotes, and does he agree with B, clearly outside quotes?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000973">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The only problem is that an alternative interpretation of that is that it is indirect speech and the member for Stuart is summarising what Mr Sanjeev Gupta said, but in this instance the member for Stuart says he is not attributing that to Mr Sanjeev Gupta.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000974">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Correct, sir, and when you asked me in the hallway that was my direct answer straightaway because that was my intention. If I may, I think that the Treasurer did not hear that in the quote I said 'Australia' and in the second part I said 'South Australia'. I think he thought that I said 'South Australia' twice and that is what threw him off track.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017110178f5d4b58fd04ed2b0000975">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That may be so.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>