<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-10-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11653" />
  <endPage num="11775" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Renewable Energy Target</name>
      <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000502">
        <heading>Renewable Energy Target</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-31">
            <name>Renewable Energy Target</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-31T14:31:32" />
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000503">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-31T14:31:32" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Energy. Does the minister reject the Productivity Commission's warning that state-based renewable energy targets fail to consider the consequences of insufficient base load power?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-31">
            <name>Renewable Energy Target</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-31T14:31:47" />
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000504">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-31T14:31:47" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:31):</by>  This is the same organisation that recommended the closure of the car industry, the same organisation that thought it would be better we buy our submarines from Japan. This is the same organisation the opposition now champion. Of course, the Productivity Commission modelling talked about mechanisms of renewable energy targets. Of course, our renewable energy target had no mechanism behind it; that is, we didn't subsidise renewable energy.</text>
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000505">What the Productivity Commission was talking about was RETs to have modelling, and it is completely disingenuous for the Leader of the Opposition to get up and pretend that the state's renewable energy target is similar to the ones being criticised by the Productivity Commission, and he knows it. If he doesn't, he is not fit to be Premier. So he can choose: either he is naive or he doesn't understand what he is talking about.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000506">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000507">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  This is the Productivity Commission. This is exactly on the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000508">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I think I will make the ruling on that rather than the Treasurer be a judge in his own cause. I think the Treasurer is making a fair fist of answering the question in his own idiom. Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20171031eb2b6a4539d4454490000509">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Yes, I do reject the Productivity Commission's findings in reference to South Australia because our renewable energy target had no mechanism. Their criticism of renewable energy targets isn't of South Australia; it's of the one that the commonwealth government operate which creates certificates. Perhaps the members opposite could read the report properly.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>