<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-10-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11653" />
  <endPage num="11775" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Energy Security Target</name>
      <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000478">
        <heading>Energy Security Target</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-31">
            <name>Energy Security Target</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-31T14:23:44" />
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000479">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-31T14:23:44" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:23):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Will the South Australian government still pursue its energy security target given that EnergyAustralia has recently given information to the public that suggests that this would result in an increase in the average household bill of another $150 per household per year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-31">
            <name>Energy Security Target</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-31T14:24:05" />
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000480">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-31T14:24:05" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for the Arts) (14:24):</by>  We have a Leader of the Opposition who went out and told the South Australian people, erroneously—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000481">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000482">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —that they were going to get a $300—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000483">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I can anticipate the point of order. Let's allow the Premier to get into stride, and when he has uttered a couple of complete sentences then we can look at the point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="11681" />
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000484">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  What we have is a Leader of the Opposition who comes in here lecturing us about electricity prices, and within 24 hours of announcing his policy it disappeared from $300 to $60 to $70, and now we know that he didn't even price in the cost of the new interconnector that he says is going to save us in the future, and that will decrease this saving even further.</text>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000485">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000486">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000487">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It has been consistently the case on this side of the house that we have been promoting the single and only policy which is going to improve, essentially, the long-term security of our system, the affordability of supply and the cleanliness of our electricity system, and that is a policy that encourages renewable energy.</text>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000488">Can I remind the house and those opposite of the Port Augusta solar thermal power station, which will be up and running in 2020 as a consequence of the government procurement. This government put out to the market and has secured what is likely to be a game-changer in terms of the electricity market in this nation. We now have a renewable energy proponent that is providing dispatchable secure energy to fuel our needs in the future.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000489">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order: the leader's question was about the energy security target. The Premier has not mentioned that once. He is not anywhere near it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000490">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I may not be understanding the Premier very well, but I took it that the purport of his answer is that he intends to continue to pursue the target. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000491">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Exactly. If those opposite had paid some attention when we made the announcement to defer the implementation of the target, they would realise that the deferral was made until 2020, the very date on which new competition will emerge in the system through the mechanism of the Port Augusta solar thermal plant. So the Port Augusta solar thermal plant is germane to the very question that the Leader of the Opposition asked, and I think that the South Australian community are excited about the investments that this government is making to drive renewable energy in this state and in this nation. They are increasingly aware of the national and international leadership role that we are playing in renewable energy.</text>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000492">Even today we are seeing the announcement by the billionaire Sanjeev Gupta to make a further investment of almost a further billion dollars in a battery to provide a further investment into Port Augusta. When the people of South Australia understand that it's the Leader of the Opposition who wants to scrap our renewable energy target, they will realise the next election is, indeed, a referendum on renewable energy. A government that is prepared to pursue—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000493">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Bring it on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000494">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Bring it on—excellent. Okay, let's have a referendum on renewable energy at the next state election and, when it goes as I expect it to go, I expect that after the next election you will be supporting our renewable energy policy because the people of South Australia understand that this is the future. They understand that it is the future for jobs. They understand that it is the future for new technology. They understand that taking advantage of these renewable sources will provide us with a secure, affordable and reliable energy system in the future.</text>
        <text id="2017103133943eb2328540bf80000495">For those opposite to be promoting something of a renewable energy future, it really does tell you that they are confining the population of this state and this nation to something which ultimately has no future, because the very definition of 'renewable' tells you that we have a continuing, sustainable future. They want to lock us into the technologies of the past.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>