<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11127" />
  <endPage num="11243" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>School Attendance</name>
      <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001752">
        <inserted>
          <heading>School Attendance</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-27">
            <name>School Attendance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001753">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey)</by> (17 May 2017).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Higher Education and Skills</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-27">
            <name>School Attendance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001754">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Higher Education and Skills):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001755">
          <inserted>The triggers for consideration of referral vary widely for each case; however policy and legislative requirements must have been met before prosecution can be considered. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001756">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Schools are required to record, monitor and follow up on non-attendance.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001757">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Students must have been absent a certain amount of days that highlights early concerns about a student's attendance. These are categorised as the:</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001758">
          <item sublevel="2" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Habitual at five absences per term </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001759">
          <item sublevel="2" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Chronic non-attendance at ten absences per term </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001760">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>It is noted however, in practice, the matters that have been referred for prosecution have involved significantly more serious non-attendance than the ten days per term chronic non-attendance criterion.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001761">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Referral to and involvement of local support services personnel is a mandatory requirement in order to move towards the prosecution process.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001762">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>The Department for Education and Child Development (DECD) will only consider prosecution of a parent in cases where it is determined to be in the best interest of the child; all other interventions have been unsuccessful; and fair warnings have been provided.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001763">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Fair warnings are given to families before undertaking this action.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001764">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>The process to put a case forward for prosecution involves considerable review of the circumstances of the non-attendance, the family context capacity, interagency collaborations and the outcome that might be achieved.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001765">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Legal advice is also sought on whether DECD could proceed to prosecution under the <term>Education Act 1972</term> in relation to non-attendance.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001766">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>My approval is required under the law for the initiation of such an action.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001767">
          <inserted>Due to the complexity of the issues involved in non-attendance, many factors are taken into account when developing a plan to support re-engagement.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="11243" />
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001768">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>There are a range of departmental and social policies in place to support the safety, wellbeing and learning success of children. These are all considered and applied in order to address the issues which may contribute to the non-attendance.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001769">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>The children and young people who are involved in this process are carefully monitored and supported by schools and support service personnel to ensure that they re-engage with education. The family is also offered and connected to appropriate support services.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201709272bacf21b4d7041cd90001770" />
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>