<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11127" />
  <endPage num="11243" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
      <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000439">
        <heading>Oakden Mental Health Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-27">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-09-27T14:49:14" />
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000440">
          <timeStamp time="2017-09-27T14:49:14" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (14:49):</by>  My question is to the member for Taylor. Have you been questioned by ICAC in relation to the Oakden inquiry?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000441">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I warn the member for Davenport because he must know—he must have known when he rose to ask the question—that it was out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000442">
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK:</by>  Point of order, sir: yesterday you ruled that the member for Wright could ask the member for Mount Gambier a question in a similar vein. Today, you have ruled the same question out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000443">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, I did, for the compelling reason that yesterday's questions were about—</text>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000444">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4339">Mr Whetstone interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000445">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  To whom is the member for Chaffey referring?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Koutsantonis</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000446">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis:</by>  To me, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000447">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That's alright then. The questions from the member for Wright to the member for Mount Gambier yesterday—there were two of them—were just in order because the member for Mount Gambier is responsible to the house for his pecuniary interests register. The member for Taylor is not responsible to the house for—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="11162" />
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000448">
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK:</by>  She is responsible for her conduct as a minister, and ICAC is interested in that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000449">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It is not a circumstance where a private member, a backbencher, is responsible to the house when that person has ceased to be a minister. The question should, perhaps, be addressed to the current minister or to the Premier. In any case, we know what the ICAC law of this state is: if the member did it outside the house he would be committing an offence. The only thing that covers him for what he has just done is parliamentary privilege, but he is out of order and I rule the question out. Does the member have another question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170927a90a45b38475483380000450">
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK:</by>  No, sir.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>