<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-09-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11041" />
  <endPage num="11125" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) (No 2) Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="r4175">
          <name>Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) (No 2) Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001133">
        <heading>Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) (No 2) Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001134">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001135">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001136">(Continued from 9 August 2017.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1804">
          <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001137">
            <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I indicate that the opposition supports the bill. I have received notice this morning of an amendment foreshadowed by the Attorney-General with an explanatory paragraph from a policy adviser from the department. I do not fully understand what that means, but obviously it deletes the Police Ombudsman. It proposes the review agency. I am not quite sure how that comes about, but perhaps that can be explained. Otherwise, I indicate that we are supporting the bill.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1810">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <page num="11119" />
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001138">
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  First of all, can I thank the deputy leader for her indication of support; it is very much appreciated. I will do my best to provide now an explanation for the amendment. If there is any further issue that I can help the deputy leader with, I am more than happy, obviously, to try to attend to that during the committee stage.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001139">The amendment to the Surveillance Devices Act is to address a technical oversight. The act received a royal assent on 23 February 2016 but is yet to come into operation. That act currently prescribes the Police Ombudsman as the review agency for South Australia Police. The review agency has functions under the act to inspect the records of investigating agencies, in this case the records of SA Police. The Police Complaints and Discipline Act 2016 created a new complaints scheme that resulted in the closure of the Police Ombudsman from 4 September 2017.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001140">The Police Complaints and Discipline Act made the consequential amendments to a number of statutes to transfer the functions and powers of the Police Ombudsman to other agencies, but a consequential amendment to the Surveillance Devices Act was overlooked. Amendment No. 1 removes the Police Ombudsman as the review agency for SA Police and replaces it with the reviewer under schedule 4 of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act. The Hon. Kevin Duggan AM QC has been appointed as the reviewer under schedule 4 of that act until 4 March 2020. The amendment is consistent with the review agency for SA Police under the Listening and Surveillance Devices Act 1972, which the Surveillance Devices Act will replace.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001141">
            <item sublevel="2">Bill read a second time.</item>
          </text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001142">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001143">In committee.</text>
        <talker kind="speech" role="office">
          <name>The Chair</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001144">
            <by role="office">The CHAIR:</by>  We need to advise the committee that as Chair I will be making a clerical change to include 'No. 2' in the short title. Is everyone okay with that? It is to distinguish it from other bills with similar names. Apparently, you like to name bills in a similar fashion.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001145">Clauses 1 to 6 passed.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001146">New clause 7.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1810">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001147">
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I move:</text>
          <text continued="true" id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001148">
            <inserted>Amendment No 1 [AG–1]—</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001149">
            <inserted>Page 3, after line 34—After clause 6 insert:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001150">
            <inserted>Part 5—Amendment of Surveillance Devices Act 2016</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001151">
            <inserted>7—Amendment of section 3—Interpretation</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001152">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>Section 3(1), definition of <term>review agency</term>, (a)—delete 'the Police Ombudsman' and substitute:</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001153">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>the reviewer under Schedule 4 of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001154">New clause inserted.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001155">Title passed.</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001156">Bill reported with amendment.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001157">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2017-09-26T20:22:08" />
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001158">
            <timeStamp time="2017-09-26T20:22:08" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (20:22):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001159">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170926d1cf58877bf6467a90001160">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>