<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-08-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10729" />
  <endPage num="10805" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000856">
      <heading>Estimates Replies</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000857">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-08-08">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000858">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (1 August 2016).  (Estimates Committee A) </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-08-08">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000859">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000860">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;The heading on page 26 states 'Investing Expenditure Summary' and hence the $256 million reflected in the table is the investing expenditure component only of the new RAH project budget. The difference of $207.5 million is the operating expenditure component of the total project budget, which includes operating related costs such as transition, remediation and dual running.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000861">
          <inserted>
            <table>
              <rowtitle>
                <cell>NEW RAH BUDGET</cell>
                <cell>TOTAL Program $'000</cell>
              </rowtitle>
              <row>
                <cell>Investing</cell>
                <cell>256,049</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Operating</cell>
                <cell>207,517</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total Budget—SA Health</cell>
                <cell>463,566</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000862" />
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000863">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;The funding for commercial settlement which included remediation, was approved by cabinet in September 2015, and published as a policy measure as part of the 2015-16 MYBR (pages 32-33).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20170808414f6acf243c4de6b0000864">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;The total project figure increased by $87.8 million from the 2015-16 budget to the 2016-17 budget. The majority of this relates to the additional resources announced as part of the 2015-16 MYBR. As I pointed out in the estimates hearing at the time, the $34.3 million in net additional funding announced in the MYBR was a net number that included savings of $57.1 million due to budgeted service payments no longer required to be made to SAHP as a result of the delay. The total project figure does not include service payments (which commence after the project is essentially complete), and therefore is a gross figure that doesn't factor in the saving. </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>