<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-07-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10489" />
  <endPage num="10570" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Carbon Emissions</name>
      <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000583">
        <heading>Carbon Emissions</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-07-06">
            <name>Carbon Emissions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-07-06T14:39:23" />
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000584">
          <timeStamp time="2017-07-06T14:39:23" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:39):</by>  How much will the government's plan to introduce and operate diesel generators in South Australia contribute to its plan to increase emissions in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-07-06">
            <name>Carbon Emissions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-07-06T14:39:35" />
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000585">
          <timeStamp time="2017-07-06T14:39:35" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:39):</by>  Again, there are no plans to increase emissions, despite the standing orders not allowing loaded questions in question time. I also note that we have said all along that if we can have gas-fired generation rather than diesel, we will. If we can have hybrid generators rather than diesel, we will. But what we are saying is that the market cannot provide the sufficient generation that we need over summer, so the government is stepping in to make sure we have sufficient capacity.</text>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000586">Our generators will not be operating all the time. Our generators will only operate in lieu of load shedding. The member opposite I thought knew that. So we plan, hopefully, to not run these generators. They are there in case the market falls short so we don't load shed South Australians. We are not operating these generators as competitors in the market. We are not operating these generators on a commercial basis, and interjecting and screaming are no substitute for a question. If members opposite want questions about how the generators will work, they will work this way: if AEMO advise the government that there would be a load shed—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000587">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Treasurer, I don't recall the member for Stuart raising his voice.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000588">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I was talking about the member for Davenport, sir. You are paying attention, of course. I know that, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000589">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I am.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000590">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  If AEMO have load shedding, if they forecast load shedding because for whatever reason the market can't provide the sufficient electrons we need to maintain stability, we will offer our generation in lieu of load shedding. Now, this could be for an hour; it could be for half an hour. We don't expect to run these generators as competitive offers in the market, so the idea that this will somehow increase emissions dramatically is ridiculous, let alone the massive offsets that we have in the South Australian electricity market through our massive amounts of renewable energy—over 1,700 megawatts of wind and over 700 megawatts of solar energy.</text>
        <text id="20170706a965088714954f0e80000591">Members opposite have called on us to abandon our renewable energy target and said we have gone too fast, too quickly, and now today they are complaining that we’ve got too much or it's not enough. I have to say that it is a confused position by members opposite.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>