<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10139" />
  <endPage num="10213" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Criminal Law Consolidation (Criminal Organisations) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000720">
        <heading>Criminal Law Consolidation (Criminal Organisations) Amendment Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000721">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2017-06-21T15:42:00" />
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000722">
            <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T15:42:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:42):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Criminal Law Consolidation Act. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <page num="10190" />
        <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000723">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2017-06-21T15:42:24" />
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000724">
            <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T15:42:24" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:42):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000725">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000726">The Criminal Law Consolidation (Criminal Organisations) Amendment Bill 2017 amends part 3B division 2 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1934. That division contains a scheme that responds to serious and organised crime in our community. I seek leave to insert the remainder of the second reading explanation in <term>Hansard</term> without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000727">Leave granted.</text>
          <text continued="true" id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000728">
            <inserted>Background</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000729">
            <inserted>In 2015, the <term>Statutes Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2015 </term>('2015 Act')<term></term>was passed. The 2015 Act inserted Division 2 into Part 3B the CLCA. Division 2 is headed 'public places, prescribed places and prescribed events'. It is directed toward participants in criminal organisations. It prohibits such people from:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000730">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>being knowingly present in a public place with 2 or more other participants in a criminal organisation;</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000731">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>entering a prescribed place or attending a prescribed event; or </inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000732">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>recruiting another person to become a participant in a criminal organisation.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000733">
            <inserted>For the purposes of Division 2, 'criminal organisation' is defined in three ways. Criminal organisation means: </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000734">
            <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;an organisation of 3 or more persons who:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000735">
            <item sublevel="2" bullet="true">
              <inserted>have as their purpose, or as 1 of their purposes, engaging in, organising, planning, facilitating, supporting, or otherwise conspiring to engage in, serious criminal activity; and</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000736">
            <item sublevel="2" bullet="true">
              <inserted>by their association represent an unacceptable risk to the safety, welfare or order of the community; or </inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000737">
            <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;a declared organisation within the meaning of the <term>Serious and Organised Crime (Control) Act 2008</term>; or</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000738">
            <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;an entity declared by regulation to be a criminal organisation.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000739">
            <inserted>For the purposes of the third limb of the definition, the Criminal Law Consolidation (Criminal Organisations) Regulations 2015 declare 10 entities to be criminal organisations. Those Regulations are not a product of the usual regulation making process. They were contained in a schedule to the 2015 Act and converted to regulations on its assent. </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000740">
            <inserted>The process that must be followed in order to declare any additional organisations for the purposes of the third limb of the definition of criminal organisation is detailed in section 83GA of the CLCA. There is scope for a report from the Crime and Public Integrity Policy Committee, there is scope for the Minister to consider any information suggesting a link between the entity and serious criminal activity, relevant convictions, and a range of other information. A regulation declaring a criminal organisation may be disallowed by resolution of either House of Parliament. In this way, the Parliament retains control over which further entities, if any, are declared to be criminal organisations. </inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000741">
            <inserted>Removal of no criminal purpose defence</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000742">
            <inserted>In relation to each of the offence provisions in Part 3B, Division 2 there is a 'no criminal purpose' defence. It first occurs in section 83GC(2), which provides that:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000743">
            <inserted>It is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (1) for the defendant to prove that the criminal organisation in which it is alleged that the defendant is a participant is not an organisation that has, as 1 of its purposes, the purpose of engaging in, or conspiring to engage in, criminal activity.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000744">
            <inserted>Where the no criminal purpose defence is raised, the prosecution is required to disprove it. This means that the prosecution is required to prove that the criminal organisation had, at the relevant time, the purpose of engaging in or conspiring to engage in criminal activity. </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000745">
            <inserted>The no criminal purpose defence is problematic where an entity has been declared to be a criminal organisation, particularly under the third limb of the definition of criminal organisation. In those circumstances, where the no criminal purpose defence is raised, the prosecution will be required to adduce complex evidence about the purpose or purposes of the criminal organisation that would not otherwise be required in the proceedings. </inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="10191" />
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000746">
            <inserted>In the view of this Government, the prosecution should not have to prove the criminal purpose of an organisation that has already been declared by the Parliament to be a criminal organisation. Once an entity falls within the scope of the definition of  criminal organisation, and participants in the entity engage in conduct that is prohibited by Part 3B, Division 2 of the CLCA, the offence provisions should be readily enforceable in relation to members of that criminal organisation. </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000747">
            <inserted>For these reasons, this Bill deletes the no criminal purpose defence where it occurs in Division 2 of Part 3B of the CLCA. Depending on the circumstances, common law or statutory defences may be available to an accused. </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000748">
            <inserted>The Government believes that the removal of the no criminal purpose defence will improve the practical workability of Division 2 of Part 3B of the CLCA and will ensure that it remains a useful tool in the suite of responses that this Government has implemented to combat serious and organised crime. </inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000749">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000750">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000751">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000752">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000753">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000754">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000755">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment of section 83GC—Participants in criminal organisation being knowingly present in public places</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000756">
            <inserted>This clause amends section 83GC of the Act to remove the defence contained in subsection (2). Currently, subsection (2) provides that it is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (1) for the defendant to prove that the criminal organisation in which it is alleged that the defendant is a participant is not an organisation that has, as 1 of its purposes, the purpose of engaging in, or conspiring to engage in, criminal activity.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000757">
            <inserted>4—Amendment of section 83GD—Participants in criminal organisation entering prescribed places and attending prescribed events</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000758">
            <inserted>This clause amends section 83GD of the Act to remove the defence contained in subsection (3). Currently, subsection (3) provides that it is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (1) or (2) to prove that the criminal organisation is not an organisation that has, as 1 of its purposes, the purpose of engaging in, or conspiring to engage in, criminal activity.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000759">
            <inserted>5—Amendment of section 83GE—Participants in criminal organisation recruiting persons to become participants in the organisation</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000760">
            <inserted>This clause amends section 83GE of the Act to remove the defence contained in subsection (2). Currently, subsection (2) provides that it is a defence to a charge of an offence against subsection (1) to prove that the criminal organisation in which it is alleged that the defendant is a participant is not an organisation that has, as 1 of its purposes, the purpose of engaging in, or conspiring to engage in, criminal activity.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000761">
            <item>
              <inserted>Schedule 1—Transitional provision</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000762">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Transitional provision</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000763">
            <inserted>This clause provides a transitional provision such that an amendment of the <term>Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935</term> made by this Act will apply only in respect of an offence alleged to have occurred after the commencement of this Act.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2017062114c6bac1ae0c4bb280000764">Debate adjourned on motion of Ms Chapman.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>