<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10139" />
  <endPage num="10213" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
      <text id="20170621ace23d93ee1a429bb0000568">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Club</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-21">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-21T15:01:02" />
        <text id="20170621ace23d93ee1a429bb0000569">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T15:01:02" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (15:01):</by>  My supplementary question is to the Premier. Given the minister has just advised that—and I think his quote was—'nobody showed up', what due diligence did the Premier undertake before telling the people of South Australia on 31 March last year that more than one million people will learn more about the tourism and studying opportunities we can provide in South Australia as a result of that sponsorship reported to be $600,000?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Investment and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-21">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-21T15:01:26" />
        <text id="20170621ace23d93ee1a429bb0000570">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T15:01:26" />
          <by role="member" id="631">The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Minister for Investment and Trade, Minister for Small Business, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (15:01):</by>  The member is obviously not listening to the answer. You need to listen to the answer before you ask a supplementary question because, as has been explained, this was completely a private venture by the entity concerned. The $600,000 sponsorship, which has been publicly reported as having been provided, was in the hope that they would succeed.</text>
        <text id="20170621ace23d93ee1a429bb0000571">They spent much more than that and they lost a significant amount, and we are very sad that that occurred on their behalf. But when a private venture goes to another country and runs an event, that is the risk that you take, and it would have been delightful if it had been successful, but it wasn't. We were happy to support it, but unfortunately it didn't work out for them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>