<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10139" />
  <endPage num="10213" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
      <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000558">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Club</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-21">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-21T14:57:02" />
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000559">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T14:57:02" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (14:57):</by>  Supplementary: given the Premier's answer just then, in which it was characterised that the Royal Adelaide Club, perhaps with the encouragement of the Adelaide city council, undertook some engagement with the beer festival in Qingdao, why then did the Premier identify in March last year that a substantial presence at the Qingdao International Beer Festival was a coup for South Australia, and why was the presence there described as a joint venture between the Adelaide city council, the state government, Australian Trade Alliance and The Social Creative, the Adelaide company behind the Royal Croquet Club?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Investment and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-21">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Club</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-21T14:57:41" />
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000560">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-21T14:57:41" />
          <by role="member" id="631">The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Minister for Investment and Trade, Minister for Small Business, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (14:57):</by>  I will take this question because I am in a position to provide some additional information, Mr Speaker. Let's just be clear about this: this was a proposal by the Royal Croquet Club. It was their venture from the outset. They came to the council and to government seeking support. It was completely their idea. On 15 June 2016, the directors of that organisation announced that the company, along with its parent company, The Social Creative, and the Royal Adelaide Club would be placed into voluntary administration partly as a consequence of their initiative.</text>
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000561">Several corporate entities associated with the Adelaide Croquet Club launched that venture to which the member refers. The SA government was one of many sponsors in the private venture. We wanted them to succeed, but it was their idea. I will say to you that when I spoke to them I urged them to do a reconnaissance and some thorough business research before they put their neck out. I strongly urged them to go to the Qingdao beer festival and look at what unfolded, rather than relying upon information they had been given.</text>
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000562">The decisions they made in regard to how they approached the matter are for them to answer, but it has been made publicly available how it ended from their point of view. The South Australian government—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000563">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  We know that, but how much did you give them?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="10178" />
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000564">
          <by role="member" id="631">The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Well, if the deputy leader would like to ask a question, hop up and ask one, Vickie. I have been waiting for a question from you. On Facebook, the club claim:</text>
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000565">
          <inserted>The Royal Adelaide Club is an initiative led by the Adelaide City Council and the South Australian government to celebrate the sister city and sister state relationships with Qingdao and Shandong Province. Coopers Brewery, Yalumba Wines, Mori Seafood, Cleanseas Seafood, Stehr Seafood and Adelaide University will represent South Australia at the Royal Adelaide Club during the month-long festival.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000566">That description was not quite correct. The SA government was a sponsor only. We provided them with support. It was their venture. The Royal Adelaide Club showcased SA food, wine and beer in Qingdao, and I give them credit because they put on a very good show. They put on a very good show and they established a very good presence in Qingdao, and it was actually quite a good stand. The only trouble was that people didn't turn up, and had they turned up I'm sure it would have been quite successful.</text>
        <text id="20170621ab7ff9cc3d4f467eb0000567">The Royal Adelaide Club Pty Ltd established in Qingdao an Adelaide trading company limited, Huangdo, in order to import sample products, such as beer, wine, food, beef, lamb and pork. I am advised they approached the Adelaide city council with concerns regarding import duties and bond-store delays, and those concerns were raised with us and we tried to help them with it. I just make the point that this was completely a private venture. We would love for it to have succeeded. We were, along with the council, happy to support them, but essentially it was their show and it was theirs to run. Now, that's what happened.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>