<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="10059" />
  <endPage num="10138" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Children's Hospital</name>
      <page num="10091" />
      <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000577">
        <heading>Children's Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-20">
            <name>Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-20T14:23:58" />
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000578">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-20T14:23:58" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:23):</by>  A supplementary to the Premier: is it the government's intention to separate seriously ill women from their babies under the new model of care just advanced by the Premier?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-20">
            <name>Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-20T14:24:08" />
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000579">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-20T14:24:08" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:24):</by>  No, it's not; of course it's not. Children and neonates—</text>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000580">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000581">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  No, it's not. The Leader of the Opposition never ceases to astound me with his ignorance or wilful misreading of what is proposed. Neonates will be in the new Adelaide women's hospital. The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit will be in the new women's hospital. Paediatric care will continue in the children's hospital at the North Adelaide site while planning starts on a new children's hospital, which will be near the precinct, which will be a paediatric service.</text>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000582">But the neonatal intensive care—just to make it clear for the Leader of the Opposition, newborn babies will be looked after in a neonatal intensive care unit at the new women's hospital. That is why it is there, and it is important to have it there because the clinical advice is that it is important to have those support services from your highest level acuity hospital next to your women's hospital where you are undertaking some of the most complex and difficult birthing. It is important to have those co-located.</text>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000583">The clinicians who have advised us on this tell me this is world's best practice. Unlike those opposite, I always listen closely to our clinicians. The Leader of the Opposition—talk about come in spinner. I am happy to compare our record when it comes to investment in our health care and our public hospitals to the opposition's any day. If there is one thing you can trust the Liberal Party in South Australia on, it is to do nothing when it comes to investment in our public hospitals.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000584">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000585">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Is the point of order that when a minister says, 'Come in spinner,' he is probably going to be less than relevant?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000586">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Subsequent to that, he was less than relevant.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170620cf738d9c75fb41a680000587">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>