<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9999" />
  <endPage num="10058" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000726">
      <heading>Bills</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment (Electricity and Gas) Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="s3980">
          <name>Statutes Amendment (Electricity and Gas) Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000727">
        <heading>Statutes Amendment (Electricity and Gas) Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Final Stages</name>
        <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000728">
          <heading>Final Stages</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000729">Consideration in committee of the Legislative Council's amendments.</text>
        <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000730">(Continued from 28 March 2017.)</text>
        <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000731">
          <term>Amendment No. 1:</term>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="633">
          <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000732">
            <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000733">
            <inserted>That the Legislative Council's amendment No. 1 be disagreed to.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20170601fce37866236e434290000734">The government initially opposed this amendment after taking advice on the proposed requirements from SAPN. SAPN had previously advised that a requirement to provide advance notice of an inspection of a property owned in two months was unduly restrictive. The initial time frames were considered to be unworkable due to various factors beyond SAPN's control that may affect the inspection work and cause unforeseeable delays with severe weather conditions (fire danger season) being a dominant factor.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000735">Such delays raised concern that the fire danger season could be in operation before SAPN had the chance to adequately inspect power lines to proactively assess any potential fire danger and maintain public safety. However, in subsequent discussions with SAPN, SAPN acknowledged community concerns and endeavoured to work with all stakeholders to find a suitable balance between the requirements to inspect their assets in an efficient manner and the expectation of landowners to exercise control over their property.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000736">SAPN has subsequently advised they consider the compromise of one month's notice period for an inspection to occur will strike an acceptable balance. SAPN has also agreed to publish at least one month before a prescribed notice in a newspaper circulating within that particular area and conducting the inspection during the specified time period outlined in the prescribed notice. This is in lieu of the original amendment proposed by Mr Lucas to publish notices in two separate newspapers and broadcast on two separate radio stations within the area of council, which was deemed to be excessively onerous.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000737">I am advised that SAPN officers always exercise a high degree of common sense and provide clear information to a home owner prior to entering onto premises. Also, it is most likely that SAPN officers would undertake this work during ordinary business hours. These safeguards are intended to strike the right balance between the maintenance of important property rights and the necessity to ensure that vegetation is well maintained ahead of the summer bushfire season. On that basis, we are prepared to accept the amendment, although my last-minute plea is that opposition not proceed, but if they insist, the government will accept.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="4342">
          <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000738">
            <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  I move the following alternative amendment:</text>
          <text continued="true" id="20170601fce37866236e434290000739">
            <inserted>Amendment No 1—</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000740">
            <inserted>Page 7, lines 10 to 32—Delete the clause and substitute:</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="10051" />
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000741">
            <inserted>11—Amendment of section 48—Entry for purposes related to infrastructure</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000742">
            <inserted>(1)&amp;#x9;Section 48—after subsection (2) insert:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000743">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>(2a)&amp;#x9;Despite subsection (2), an electricity officer may exercise a power of entry referred to in that subsection without giving notice in accordance with subsection (2) in relation to electricity infrastructure situated on land that is in the area of a council and in the bushfire risk area if—</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000744">
            <item sublevel="3">
              <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;the purpose of the entry is to conduct an inspection of the infrastructure; and</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000745">
            <item sublevel="3">
              <inserted>(b)&amp;#x9;—</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000746">
            <item sublevel="4">
              <inserted>(i)&amp;#x9;the electricity entity gives reasonable written notice of the date and time of the proposed entry to the occupier of the land; or</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000747">
            <item sublevel="4">
              <inserted>(ii)&amp;#x9;if it is not reasonably practicable for the electricity entity to give notice in accordance with subparagraph (i), the electricity entity—</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000748">
            <item sublevel="5">
              <inserted>(A)&amp;#x9;publishes, at least 1 month before the proposed inspection of infrastructure in the area of the council, a prescribed notice in a newspaper circulating within that area; and</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000749">
            <item sublevel="5">
              <inserted>(B)&amp;#x9;conducts the inspection during the period specified in the prescribed notice.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000750">
            <inserted>(2)&amp;#x9;Section 48—after subsection (7) insert:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000751">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>(8)&amp;#x9;In this section—</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000752">
            <item sublevel="3">
              <inserted>
                <term>prescribed notice</term>, in relation to an inspection of electricity infrastructure by an electricity entity in the area of a council, means a notice that specifies the period (of up to 1 month) during which the entity proposes to inspect its infrastructure in the area.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20170601fce37866236e434290000753">Let me say at the outset that I am very grateful to members of the Legislative Council who supported the amendment, which was passed, dealing with this issue. I am very grateful that they supported that amendment. I have had discussions with SAPN and, while they would have liked, as the minister has made clear he would like, to have no change to the initial bill in this regard, I was not prepared to agree to that. But I can happily say that representatives of SAPN and I have come to an agreement.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000754">I have that agreement very clearly from them—and it has been passed on to the government as well—that they are comfortable with this amendment. It is very important that land occupiers are given advance warning when SAPN wants to come onto their property for inspections. I think it is perfectly fair that they get that warning. I accept that what I initially asked for would have been onerous for SAPN to implement. It would not have been an unreasonable level of advice for the land occupiers to receive but it would have been more difficult than I anticipated for SAPN to implement.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000755">We have come to an agreement that they will do one of two things: they will either give direct advice to individual land occupiers in advance of an intention to enter their property for inspection or they will give them reasonable notice and advice of exactly when they plan to come. If that is not possible, they will give at least one month's notice of a subsequent one-month window when they would enter those properties.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000756">For your benefit, Deputy Speaker, and for the benefit of those who might be following this, the reason we have both those opportunities in there is that we want what we are deciding here in this chamber today—which, hopefully, will be supported in the other chamber shortly—not to need change for quite a long time. Ideally, we want all land occupiers to receive advice, but right now SAPN is not able to provide that advice directly. They have a database that has records of meters on properties, but the owners of those meters are not necessarily the land occupiers.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000757">You can imagine a situation where you have a farm, and someone lives on that farm and they have a meter registered in their name. They live in the farmhouse, but they lease all the working land out to someone else. It is actually that other land occupier who needs to receive that advice, not the person who lives in the house but who no longer does the farming. We hope that one day technology will allow us to do that, and we hope that SAPN's database will improve so that it can be done, but until that time landholders and land occupiers will receive one month's notice in advance through the relevant local newspaper.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker kind="speech" role="office">
          <name>The Speaker</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <page num="10052" />
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000758">
            <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  If this question is agreed to, amendment No. 1 of the Legislative Council will be negatived and the alternative amendment proposed by the member for Stuart will be inserted in lieu thereof, so we are voting to disagree with amendment No. 1 of the Legislative Council and insert the member for Stuart's amendment.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000759">Motion carried.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000760">
            <term>Amendments Nos 2 to 15:</term>
          </text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="633">
          <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000761">
            <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000762">
            <inserted>That the Legislative Council's amendments Nos 2 to 15 be agreed to.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000763">Motion carried.</text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000764">
            <event>Sitting suspended from 15:48 to 17:00.</event>
          </text>
          <text id="20170601fce37866236e434290000765">
            <event>Sitting extended beyond 17:00 on motion of Hon. S.C. Mullighan.</event>
          </text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>