<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-06-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9999" />
  <endPage num="10058" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
      <text id="20170601dd7f00e8837848a0a0000612">
        <heading>Oakden Mental Health Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-01">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-01T14:55:14" />
        <text id="20170601dd7f00e8837848a0a0000613">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-01T14:55:14" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (14:55):</by>  A supplementary to the Minister for Mental Health: has the minister personally discussed the Ward 18 option with the Chief Psychiatrist?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-01">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-01T14:55:24" />
        <text id="20170601dd7f00e8837848a0a0000614">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-01T14:55:24" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:55):</by>  I have responsibility for the Repat site, and when the issue was first canvassed by the opposition that Ward 18 (the old Ward 18) might be a suitable place to put the Oakden residents, I spoke to senior officers in SALHN about its suitability for that purpose to which they have responded emphatically that it is not for the reasons I described.</text>
        <text id="20170601dd7f00e8837848a0a0000615">You can keep running this flag up the pole as much as you want. The simple answer is that it is not suited to the sorts of long-term requirements for patients at the Oakden facility. It is a short-term acute care facility for relatively short periods of stay. It doesn't have the facilities which are required for people needing the sort of long-term care that residents of the Oakden facility have. You can keep going on as much as you want about it, but they are the clinical facts.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>