<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9925" />
  <endPage num="9998" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
      <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000356">
        <heading>Oakden Mental Health Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-31">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-31T14:31:01" />
        <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000357">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-31T14:31:01" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (14:31):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Mental Health. Given SASMOA's claim that SA Health met with employee representatives between 2011 and 2014 to consult on an improved older persons mental health service model of care and reform agenda, why did this work not progress?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-31">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-31T14:31:21" />
        <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000358">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-31T14:31:21" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:31):</by>  I will have to find out what happened, but I can be very clear that SASMOA didn't raise this issue with me. If they had significant concerns about models of care at the Oakden facility, I would have expected that that would have been escalated to me. What they had raised concerns about—and again I emphasise not with me but directly with the chief executive of the Northern Adelaide Local Health Network—was about medical cover at the facility. At no stage did they hint at the sort of systemic abuse that was uncovered by the Chief Psychiatrist. Their concerns were essentially industrial and about medical cover—</text>
        <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000359">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000360">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader is on two warnings, and that's the second time I have told him that he is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201705317c56feb4e1f54714a0000361">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —at the facility, and I would have expected that if they had felt that Health had not adequately addressed the concerns they were raising they would have escalated that matter, which they didn't.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>