<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9925" />
  <endPage num="9998" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
      <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000327">
        <heading>Oakden Mental Health Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-31">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-31T14:25:45" />
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000328">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-31T14:25:45" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (14:25):</by>  Supplementary to the minister: did SA Health commit to a review?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-31">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-31T14:25:55" />
        <page num="9951" />
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000329">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-31T14:25:55" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:25):</by>  I will double-check the correspondence, but my—</text>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000330">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000331">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  I will double-check the correspondence—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000332">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000333">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —but my recollection from having just read the letter is that it was a particular issue about medical—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1805" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Goldsworthy</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000334">
          <by role="member" id="1805">Mr Goldsworthy:</by>  He has all the detail except for this.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000335">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Kavel is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053192ee0a99384440ea80000336">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —cover at the Oakden facility. It referred to difficulties with having a particular clinician off sick, having adequate medical cover, and the chief executive of the Northern Adelaide Local Health Network responded, saying that she would continue the locum arrangements. Whether there was a review or not, I am happy to check, but in the correspondence, from my cursory reading of it before I came into question time, she undertook to do what SASMOA had asked for. I can only presume that they were satisfied with the response because they never sought to escalate this issue to me.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>