<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9867" />
  <endPage num="9924" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
      <text id="201705309dd88431236e4c51a0000557">
        <heading>Oakden Mental Health Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-30">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-30T15:16:33" />
        <text id="201705309dd88431236e4c51a0000558">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-30T15:16:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (15:16):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Mental Health. Given that concerns over staffing at Oakden were raised with the minister in a letter from the member for Makin in April 2015, why did the minister wait until receiving a letter from the Principal Community Visitor, 18 months later, before taking any action?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-30">
            <name>Oakden Mental Health Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-30T15:16:53" />
        <page num="9904" />
        <text id="201705309dd88431236e4c51a0000559">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-30T15:16:53" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (15:16):</by>  The letter was to me. It was responded to on my behalf by the now minister, and it was dealt with entirely appropriately. The letter did not raise any specific allegations: it raised issues with regard to the staffing levels at the facility. The inquiry was made with the department of whether the staffing levels were adequate, were sufficient. The answer came back yes and, on my behalf, the then parliamentary secretary responded.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>