<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9867" />
  <endPage num="9924" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
      <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000335">
        <heading>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-30">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-30T14:23:20" />
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000336">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-30T14:23:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:23):</by>  Can the Premier perhaps give some evidence to the house how his Minister for Mental Health has fulfilled her obligations under section 86(f) of the act, which specifically requires the minister to develop or promote effective systems of accountability for persons delivering mental health services in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Knoll</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000337">
          <by role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll:</by>  Just keep saying sorry.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000338">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Schubert is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2017-05-30T14:23:46" />
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000339">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-30T14:23:46" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:23):</by>  The minister commissioned the very inquiry that has been the subject of public debate. There were no questions that were asked in this house that precipitated her commissioning of this inquiry. There was no media inquiry that precipitated this inquiry. The very—</text>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000340">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000341">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000342">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  The report which has found these awful failings at this facility—a report I might add that was produced by the Chief Psychiatrist, who himself had been walking around this facility six months earlier, and then the previous three months before that an aged-care accreditation agency had given a clean bill of health to this very facility across a number of different domains, including all of the very issues that are the heart of the complaints that are now made about this facility, that is, the aged-care accreditation agency.</text>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000343">So here we have two bodies that exercise accountability in relation to the facility, the Chief Psychiatrist and the aged-care accreditation agency, and a third body that this government has put in place, the community visitor program, which means that people go into the facility and look and see what happens. Fortunately, belatedly, it revealed material which ultimately led to this inquiry.</text>
        <text id="2017053004a4db7b14df4fa6a0000344">There is no getting away from the fact that this is an appalling state of affairs, or that the fact that it hadn't been revealed for so long, hadn't been detected, by serious accountability measures such as the Chief Psychiatrist and the aged-care accreditation agency is, I think, a legitimate matter that should be properly explored. We are anxious to understand the answers as much as anyone else.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>