<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-05-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9375" />
  <endPage num="9491" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000714">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Accountability</name>
      <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000715">
        <heading>Government Accountability</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-05-09T16:08:24" />
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000716">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-09T16:08:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (16:08):</by>  Today, I rise to speak about yet another failure of this Labor government, another failure to protect our state's most vulnerable and disadvantaged and yet another failure of this government and this Premier—a failure to demonstrate any responsibility or accountability for the conduct and disgraceful practices of departments and agencies that report to them, a failure of our Westminster system of government. So often has a crisis occurred that every South Australian is now so well versed in this government playbook.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000717">First comes the apology, next the hero moment—the minister comes to the rescue, the minister has shone a light upon the problem—and then the blame game. Of course, it is not the government's responsibility to oversee the priorities or performances of bureaucrats who report to them. No, they are merely glorified paper pushers who sign letters, cut ribbons and throw tuna. The blame for repeated catastrophic failures lies foremost at the feet of bureaucrats. Finally, we get a promise for change, and this is the model of government that we see at the moment, and we see it time and time again after they hit that repeat button.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000718">The lack of accountability demonstrates an attitude that is endemic and has permeated across not only their frontbenches but every member opposite. This is a government that simply no longer cares about the welfare of everyday South Australians. The Chief Psychiatrist's report on the Oakden review details the treatment and shocking conditions that vulnerable South Australians lived in in this facility. Sadly, it is another example of this government's inability to safeguard South Australians, young and old.</text>
        <page num="9427" />
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000719">It is truly heartbreaking. It is heartbreaking to find myself once again reading about the heinous conditions these vulnerable people have been subjected to. It was not that long ago that I was reading the report of the child protection royal commission. Reviewing that gut-wrenching report, I found it very difficult reading to work through. At that time, I hoped that I would never again have to read anything like it in regard to the behaviour and actions of the government and government departments.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000720">Justice Nyland handed down the report into the catastrophic failures and systemic abuse of children in our care. Just nine months later, we read another report about how the South Australian government and the department have failed older persons in their care. South Australians expected more from their government back then, and they expect so much more from their government now. Enough of this blame game. When will it end?</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000721">Through 15 years of government, this government and the Premier have had the complete ability to choose all the staff in their departments. Every senior appointment in every government department has been hand-picked and signed off by the Premier and his senior ministers. The Premier and the government are responsible for the toxic culture in so many of our departments. The toxic culture in Families SA was created by those appointed by the government, and that same toxic culture, once again, is in the SA Health department that has overseen the Oakden crisis we are talking about so often at the moment.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000722">The findings contained in the review into the Oakden facility are beyond reproach. The Chief Psychiatrist reports that the Oakden facility is 'more like a mental institution from the middle of last century' than a modern older person's mental health facility, and some of the practices used at Oakden were 'among the most abhorrent approaches to providing care to severely disturbed consumers that any of the review had encountered in well over 110 years of collective practice'.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000723">It simply beggars belief that, in 2017, the practices at Oakden were those from over 110 years ago. I would be appalled if this were true of any modern facility, but it is galling for it to be operating here in South Australia under the nose of a government that has fallen asleep at the wheel. It is hard to comprehend that the minister was clueless about the conditions at Oakden or that the CEO of SA Health or NALHN had no idea.</text>
        <text id="201705092cf22abe10b7433a90000724">I struggle to believe that nobody at any level made an effort to raise concerns in 2016, 2015, 2014 or any other year over the past decade. Why did they not report on the conditions? Why did they not request additional staff, additional funding or infrastructure improvements, or make any attempt to seek assistance that would have improved the conditions and outcomes for Oakden residents? It is a disgrace and a blight on this government and this minister that so many people got it so wrong for so many years.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>