<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-04-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9231" />
  <endPage num="9310" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Emergency Departments</name>
      <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000415">
        <heading>Emergency Departments</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-04-12">
            <name>Emergency Departments</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-04-12T14:13:06" />
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000416">
          <timeStamp time="2017-04-12T14:13:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:13):</by>  A further question to the Minister for Health: how much did SA Health spend on the mass distribution of Transforming Health promotional material in March 2017, and would the minister agree that money would have been better spent on supporting the Modbury medical emergency team?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-04-12">
            <name>Emergency Departments</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-04-12T14:13:27" />
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000417">
          <timeStamp time="2017-04-12T14:13:27" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:13):</by>  Absolutely not. That work was worth every single dollar we have invested. When you have people in the Liberal Party telling lies, saying that the emergency department has been closed—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000418">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order: 127. I object to the minister saying that people in the Liberal Party are telling lies.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000419">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Liberal Party is not an entity that has a reputation to defend in the house. The house is concerned with individual members.</text>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000420">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000421">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I am trying to make a ruling and I have been interrupted by the member for MacKillop, whom I call to order, and the member for Adelaide and the member for Fisher.</text>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000422">
          <term>There being a disturbance in the strangers' gallery:</term>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="9259" />
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000423">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  There is to be no flash photography in the house, so could the attendants please remove the person who used flash photography in violation of the rules of the house. Would the minister be seated.</text>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000424">Just to catch up with calls to order, I notice the member for Adelaide had already been called to order, so she is warned. The members for Kavel, Hammond, Morphett and the deputy leader are called to order, and the member for Kavel is warned. Usually, the policy of the opposition is not relevant information to provide the house, so I would ask ministers only to provide small doses of that. I think the minister has already provided his dose.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000425">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Sorry, sir, but the question was: why is the Department of Health advertising information about the Modbury Hospital and about the services there? The fact that the individuals within the Liberal Party have been blatantly telling mistruths is germane is the answer to that question. Mr Speaker—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000426">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Could the attendants just deal with the flash photography in the front row of the strangers' gallery. There is to be no artificial illumination in taking photographs. The minister makes a reasonable case; he has made his point, could he move on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000427">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Certainly, sir. The fact that there have been individuals who have blatantly and recklessly told mistruths about the operation of the Modbury Hospital emergency department is the main reason why I have had my department undertake a campaign about the services that continue to be offered at the Modbury Hospital because it is important, and a matter of public safety, that people know that those mistruths are incorrect.</text>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000428">The truth is that the Modbury emergency department continues to run seven days a week, 24 hours a day, with specialist-led care. That is a very, very important matter. Just like any other public health advertising campaign—and my department undertakes to provide important information to residents—that is very, very important. If certain individuals (and they know who they are; it's on the public record) ceased providing reckless and dangerous mistruths all for base political purposes, then you would find that it may not be necessary to undertake such an advertising campaign.</text>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000429">Nonetheless, when you have individuals who are behaving so dangerously and so recklessly in putting out information that is not true, it is incumbent upon the Department of Health in this state to undertake a significant advertising campaign about the services that are offered. It is a matter of public safety, and I do not resile or apologise for it for one minute.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000430">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201704120e1a41c31d214317b0000431">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before the supplementary, which of course I will grant, I call to order the members for Mount Gambier and Hartley, and I warn the member for Hammond and the member for Mount Gambier. The deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>