<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-04-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9147" />
  <endPage num="9227" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Blackwood Roundabout</name>
      <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000718">
        <heading>Blackwood Roundabout</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-04-11">
            <name>Blackwood Roundabout</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-04-11T15:06:20" />
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000719">
          <timeStamp time="2017-04-11T15:06:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. Can the minister advise the house what his government plans to do to address the structural deficiencies of the Blackwood roundabout?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-04-11">
            <name>Blackwood Roundabout</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-04-11T15:06:34" />
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000720">
          <timeStamp time="2017-04-11T15:06:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:06):</by>  I'm glad the member for Davenport has raised the work that the state government has been putting in to improving traffic conditions in the area of the Mitcham Hills leading up to the Blackwood roundabout. As the member would be aware, some time ago a road management plan was developed for improvements throughout that area and, as funding has become available, we have been progressively rolling out improvements to the road network in that part of the metropolitan area.</text>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000721">I do concede that sometimes there are competing priorities for the set amount of roadworks that are required across the metropolitan area. While we have been able to find the resources for incredibly important upgrades—such as Springbank Road, for example, in the electorate of Waite—that has meant that some other projects, notwithstanding some of the improvements that have been made on that aforementioned road management plan, have needed to be accommodated elsewhere.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Duluk</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000722">
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr Duluk:</by>  They didn't offer me a job on that side of the house, did they? They did to you and you took it. That's the irony of it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000723">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  The member for Davenport is right: he was never offered a position in this cabinet. Yes, I can confirm that to the parliament, and certainly he is unlikely to be at any time or at any point in the future. However, we are committed, as we have been with Springbank Road, to continuing road improvements in this part of the metropolitan area. In fact, I think in the budget a bit over 18 months ago, nearly two years ago, there was a commitment for an extra $70 million of road rehabilitation funding. Of course, the day after the budget, it was my great pleasure to attend with the member for Fisher to talk about the upgrade of some of the roads in her area.</text>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000724">This part of the metropolitan road network in the southern suburbs, in the Mitcham Hills, or even around the member for Fisher's electorate, remains incredibly important to this government. That's why we continue to budget more and more funding for roadworks, for road maintenance. As the member for Mitchell would know (because he asked me this question in estimates), it has been necessary because we had a $9 million a year cut from the federal government for road maintenance, and that was at the same time that they removed $18 million a year of road maintenance funding to councils—$27 million per year is what they cut from road funding in South Australia. Of course, you will hear from those opposite, just like they do every time the federal Coalition government does over this state. Who runs to their defence but the leader and his caucus, always defending those who do over the state's interests.</text>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000725">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000726">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  He is even barking out across the chamber now. He is even defending not only those road maintenance funding cuts but the health cuts, the education cuts and the attempt to offshore the submarine build to Japan. He was out there defending them hook, line and sinker. When they dared Holden to leave, there was the Leader of the Opposition saying, 'I think it's a good thing. Why do we need automotive manufacturing in South Australia?' That's the position of the South Australian Liberal Party. They do not care one iota about the fortunes of this state economically or when it comes to road maintenance.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="9188" />
        <text id="20170411b7d0b4ac4a20401680000727">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Leader of the Opposition may curvet, but the caravan moves on.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>