<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-03-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8953" />
  <endPage num="9051" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Alinta Energy</name>
      <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001010">
        <heading>Alinta Energy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-29">
            <name>Alinta Energy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-29T14:28:30" />
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001011">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-29T14:28:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Did the government undertake any modelling to ascertain the net effect of Alinta's proposal on the South Australian economy?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-29">
            <name>Alinta Energy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-29T14:28:42" />
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001012">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-29T14:28:42" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:28):</by>  All we know is that it wasn't an offer that was capable of being accepted.</text>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001013">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001014">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  When somebody is not offering you something which is capable of acceptance—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001015">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader is on two warnings, and if he makes another utterance outside standing orders he will be departing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001016">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Let's just understand what is being suggested here. The leader of the free market party over there wants us to subsidise a coal-fired—</text>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001017">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3119">The Hon. T.R. Kenyon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001018">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Newland is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001019">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —generator that has already told us that they are about to close and can't give us any guarantee that they will stay open for any period of time. That seems to be the proposition that we are meant to entertain—</text>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001020">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001021">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I keep hearing a komitadji interjecting when he is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20170329f154cb9a1f6843f580001022">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —chucking tens of million dollars at a large corporate in this country to give them the possibility of staying open. That seems to be the proposition. Is he serious? Is that the depth of the policy analysis that is being undertaken by those opposite. What we know standing here is this: our modelling demonstrated that if we were investing in coal-fired generators, and even if they were managing to stay open despite all the caveats they put in their offer, today Pelican Point would not be open. We would have destroyed the best opportunity of us securing South Australia's energy future here today on this occasion.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>