<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-03-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8869" />
  <endPage num="8951" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
      <text id="201703285a69e97e2dcd4cd280000577">
        <heading>Medical Cannabis</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-28">
            <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T15:04:34" />
        <text id="201703285a69e97e2dcd4cd280000578">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T15:04:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">Mr WINGARD (Mitchell) (15:04):</by>  A supplementary question: why are people from this industry who are wanting to establish this industry in South Australia being shuffled from the health minister to the Minister for Substance Abuse to the Minister for Manufacturing? Who is in charge here?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-28">
            <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T15:04:48" />
        <text id="201703285a69e97e2dcd4cd280000579">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T15:04:48" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:04):</by>  It's a fair question. The Hon. Kyam Maher is the lead minister for this because, frankly, it does cross all those domains. This is an area that covers both the harvesting of cannabis sometimes for the purposes of clothing and other non-medicinal uses and, of course, it covers the question of medicinal uses, so the Minister for Health is involved. It does represent a particular manufacturing opportunity, so the minister for manufacturing is also involved. I have asked him to take the lead on pulling all these things together, and he has already conducted a number of round tables that have been very constructive.</text>
        <text id="201703285a69e97e2dcd4cd280000580">It is somewhat confusing to understand why the criticism has been directed at the South Australian government because most of the regulatory barriers in this area are actually controlled by the commonwealth. Nevertheless, that's not a reason for us not to continue to work with the company, because we often advocate with companies to assist them in overcoming regulatory barriers that exist at the commonwealth level.</text>
        <text id="201703285a69e97e2dcd4cd280000581">We need to work through each of those issues. There are issues of not insubstantial risk here that also have to be managed. Care needs to be taken that we don't expose people to risk of harm, so all those things will be addressed in due course.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>