<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-03-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8869" />
  <endPage num="8951" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000431">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Electricity Generation</name>
      <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000432">
        <heading>Electricity Generation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-28">
            <name>Electricity Generation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T14:33:37" />
        <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000433">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T14:33:37" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:33):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Did the government undertake any modelling to determine whether 250 megawatts of reserve generation could be contracted from existing providers at a lower price and sooner than the government's proposed $360 million gas generator?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-28">
            <name>Electricity Generation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T14:33:57" />
        <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000434">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T14:33:57" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:33):</by>  It's an important question because it has to clear up a lot of confusion from the opposition on this issue. Contracting with existing generation is not extra generation—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000435">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  We're aware of that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017032865fe9eeff9f4417b80000436">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  —you would hope so—because currently those generators are already in the market and available. They have visibility through the market, and it still means we are going to have shortfalls. The only way we can get through without load shedding is to have additional generation. Contracting with existing generators doesn't give us extra capacity. I thought it would have been self-evident.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>