<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-02-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8455" />
  <endPage num="8538" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Electricity Prices</name>
      <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000360">
        <heading>Electricity Prices</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-15">
            <name>Electricity Prices</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T14:24:42" />
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000361">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T14:24:42" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  Supplementary: given that the Premier has indicated that he has a new plan on the table, can he tell us how much more this new plan will cost the taxpayers of South Australia over and above the support package that Alinta called for to keep the Northern power station operational?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-15">
            <name>Electricity Prices</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T14:25:01" />
        <page num="8482" />
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000362">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T14:25:01" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:25):</by>  The thing about the Alinta power station, which the Leader of the Opposition romanticises, is that it wasn't a long-term solution for South Australia. The reason it wasn't a long-term solution for South Australia is that the private operators of that operation weren't making money. South Australians weren't buying Alinta contracts. I would like to see members table their electricity bills, so they can show us how many of them were with Alinta. I can tell you who was with Alinta: the South Australian government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000363">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order: just a point of clarification. I am a customer of Alinta.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000364">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That's a very powerful point the member for Stuart makes. It is a bogus point of order, and he will leave the chamber for the rest of question time.</text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000365">
          <event>The honourable member for Stuart having withdrawn from the chamber:</event>
        </text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000366">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000367">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned for the second and the final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000368">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Sir, I would also ask the member for Unley to withdraw his remark. He said I make things up in the parliament. I have never misled the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000369">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I am afraid I can't insist on a withdrawal because it is not of itself unparliamentary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000370">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  In a media release by Alinta in June 2015 stating that the Leigh Creek mine would close, the then chief executive, Jeff Dimery, stated that the Flinders operation had become increasingly uneconomic. On 11 June, the chief executive stated:</text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000371">
          <inserted>Throughout the four and a half years that we have been running the business we have investigated all possibilities to find a viable economic solution for its continued operation.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000372">
          <event>There being a disturbance in the strangers' gallery:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000373">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Treasurer, would you be seated. Under no circumstances is there to be flash photography in the house. Could the attendant please remove the item that was used for flash photography. Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000374">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  On 11 June, the chief executive stated:</text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000375">
          <inserted>Throughout the four and a half years that we have been running the business we have investigated all possibilities to find a viable economic solution for its continued operation. During this period the company has incurred operating losses in the vicinity of $100 million whilst at the same time investing an additional $200 million to extend the operating life of the Flinders business.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000376">Flinders closed because it wasn't making money. It was an economic decision. If the opposition wanted to do a cost-benefit analysis of an intervention into a loss-making operation at Flinders, it makes no sense. The reason the coal-fired power generator wasn't making money is that it can't react to market signals the same way gas can. When it comes on, it has to stay on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pederick</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000377">
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr Pederick:</by>  It's that thing called base load.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000378">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Well, if it's base load energy, why wasn't it on 12 months of the year? Could the opposition, instead of interjecting, give us a reason, if this was so important to the state's sovereignty, why they sold it? Why did they sell the mine? Why did they sell the generator? It's so important to the state's future, and they sold it. You have to ask yourself, Mr Speaker: if two companies could not run this thing successfully—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000379">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: you do not have to answer any questions about what has been asked. We are asking the minister to answer a question about the difference in the cost, not rant about what questions you have to answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000380">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  You shouldn't have to answer those questions, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000381">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will listen carefully to what the Treasurer has to say.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000382">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  The facts have a way of getting in the way of ramblings by members opposite. The truth is that any cost-benefit analysis done by the private sector in maintaining its operation found that it was wanting—let alone that eight other coal-fired power stations around the country have closed. This romantic view about Port Augusta—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="8483" />
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000383">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Answer the question!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000384">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Shouting at me doesn't change the facts. If this is so vital to our economic sovereignty, why did the Liberal Party sell it? Why did they sell it? If it's so important to South Australians, why did they sell it to the private sector? I voted against it; I said no. The Speaker voted against it. The member for Playford voted against it. The shadow treasurer—the architect of the privatisation of ETSA—</text>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000385">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000386">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  —still sits in their caucus, yet they have the audacity to blame us.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2017021525edc6ccc0a84927b0000387">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I am not going to warn anyone for interjecting during that flourish, but the members for Heysen, Adelaide and Mount Gambier did interject before that flourish, and accordingly I call them to order.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>